Film/Lit Geek Playwright/Screenwriter with a Master's Degree; Fighting Homelessness from Inside the Shelter from May 25, 2012 to August 25, 2020. Now Free and Still Fighting! Green Party Candidate. Campaign blog at https://votescotthutchins.wordpress.com/
And what would you do in a socialist society. Not like you would be working. You would be sat on your fat ass doing nothing but complaining about things ok the internet all day.
The only ableist person here is you. when have you seen a person with Down syndrome in a desk job?
It’s stated very clearly on my about page that I have numerous physical challenges that limit me to a desk job, and that Social Security has denied me three times on the grounds that I can do a desk job. That requires someone willing to interview me for one, Over 60 people have attempted to help me improve my resume, not one has succeeded in making one that gets me good results. And then there are the idiots like you who claim that I’m applying to jobs for which I’m not qualified–claims that they can’t back up when given examples.
Your masters degree is toilet paper and again at least someone with Down syndrome has a job. I don’t pity anyone with 250k in the bank who uses up resources someone without two nickels to rub together could be using.
“If a pERsOn WItH dOWn sYnDroMe Can staNd FOr EIghT HouRS A DaY, wHy CAn’T somEONe PHYsiCAlLy diSaBleD Do The SAMe?”
“wHeN YOU bLOw AlL THaT moNey on REnt beCAiSE YOU HAve no waY TO rePlENIsH it, it wIL PrOVe to THe EmplOYerS wHO AlREaDY Won’T inTErvIEW you thAT You cAn’T MaNagE moNeY!”
And I do not have 250k in the bank. Not even close.
I can’t spell, but I got a desk job and my drivers license. How about you? You are just an old man with a dated degree who sits and rants on the internet all day about:Bowel movements, how women don’t like you, your mother, a moving company and capitalism. Time better spent job hunting.
I’m not an old man. I have a driver’s license. My degree is not dated. It’s pointless to look for a job because I will be made homeless if I take most jobs. I’m not allowed to make more than $25,760, which is less than local minimum wage at full time, or I lose my voucher and my $2,000 apartment, which is typical for the area because employers and real estate owners are out of touch with reality.
The fact that you come here and punch down when the richest man in the world just got given a $3 billion subsidy by the government shows that your life is so pathetic and empty that you need to be a bully to feel good about yourself.
And just because I have a driver’s license doesn’t mean that I can do a driving job. sitting with my legs in one position causes me shooting pain in my legs that make me a distracted driver. this first happened on a drive back from Fayetteville where I made a documentary shoot. It still happens regularly. If it happens in a chair, it affects only me. If it happens when I’m driving, it makes me a distracted driver. That along with my bathroom issues. Anyone who thinks someone with an advanced degree should have to wear a diaper to do a job already unsuitable to them is one sick fuck and should be forced to pay my student loan debt.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, outside of hard circumstances due to no fault of one’s own or legitimate disabilities that make certain lines of work impractical, even impossible, people who live on the streets are their because of decisions of their own making.
The vast majority of people with problems stereotypically associated with homelessness (addiction and mental illness) are housed, and statistics show that those are more common among the very wealthy than the poor.
According to MIT, it happens in 0.00006% of cases. Right-wingers use it as a boogeyman in order to disenfranchise legitimate voters unlikely to vote for them.
Just like Prager University, Stossel is trying to fire up gullible haters to keep our rotten system going that funnels all the wealth to lazy shits like him.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, what about the lazy people who sit or stand on street corners asking for handouts who are able to work but choose not to? Read the comments sections for each video.
Being able to work and being able to find a potential employer willing to interview you, let alone hire you, especially if you don’t have an address, are two different things. If you were more intelligent, you would have thought of this, particularly considering to whom you’re talking. If they’re sitting rather than standing, there is an especially good chance that there are no positions they can do available to them.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, if you are ever conned out of your money by a seemingly homeless person who is only trying to line his or her own pocket, don’t say that you have not been warned. People who appear to be truly starving are those who need help. Those on the street corners who appear to be perfectly healthy otherwise holding signs advertising hardship are probably liars.
How the FUCK do you know if someone is perfectly healthy? My disabilities aren’t readily visible, and plenty of idiots think I’m faking because it’s a nerve issue that varies depending upon my exertion level.
Panhandling is protective speech under the first amendment. Demonizing panhandlers as scam artists when serious studies have shown that the vast majority are not and use the money for food just makes you sound like an asshole.
You equated asking for money with spending money on illegal things. This is not a rational comparison. Panhandling is much more similar to those ads I see on YouTube with Israeli parents begging for money because their kid has a rare disease (considering that Israel has universal health care, an ad for St. Jude might be a more valid comparison.
Equating asking for money with using money for illegal purposes is an incredibly illogical comparison on your part. If people can go on TV, radio, online asking for money, why not in person?
Scott Andrew Hutchins, here is another video for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e50fQLyebI People who use their status as welfare recipients to demand free stuff are lazy.
Wrong again, asswipe! The dishonest Fox propagandist won’t stop interrupting her to throw her off her train of thought.
Capitalists are lazyasses to hire others top do their actual work and take all the credit.
If businesses are going to make college degrees minimum barriers for obtaining employment, they should pay for it through taxation so that they can’t pick and choose who gets educated. It really is that simple.
Turn of Fox, you are rotting your mind with propaganda. Also watch the documentary, The Brainwashing of My Dad.
That is completely false. It’s because you’re too out of touch with reality to understand that people are now put in a situation that going to college is the only way for most people to have even a chance vat a decent job, but for ,many of us, we complete college and simply aren’t given a chance by the business class to have one of these better jobs, so we’re ion a mountain of debt with nothing to show for it based on the whims of others. She has a rational argument. You do not.
Unless provided voluntarily, nobody has any right to free stuff on-demand. Try pursuing a useful degree and that will help employment opportunities. The only reason college graduates can’t find jobs in some cases is due to degree choices.
As long as corporate welfare and wars of choice for the benefit of private contractors exist, we absolutely do have the right to get things we want from our tax money.
Now you sound like the imbeciles who are always telling me that I should have majored in engineering despite math being one of the few things in school I wasn’t good at other than gym and industrial arts and getting a 620 verbal and 490 math on the SAT in 1993.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, people who talk about wanting free shit on-demand are just wanting to mooch off of the taxpayers. Free college? Free health care? Goddammit, that shit is not even remotely free and these idiots know it.
Only a lying sack of shit would call this mooching off the taxpayers. Next, you’re going to call free K-12 mooching off the tax payers because you want an uneducated and easily controllable populace because you’re a fascist who thinks that the wealth should belong to an elite few. Your point of view is absolute garbage and needs to be called out as such. If these things were free, we wouldn’t be calling them to be paid for using the ridiculous amounts of taxpayer money that are used for wars of choice, corporate welfare, and mass incarceration fir victimless crimes like weed possession. It is abundantly clear that you are a pathological liar and a thief.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, the democrats gave us the evils of slavery, theft of our labor via the implementation of the federal income tax, theft of land from Native-American tribes. More people have been in poverty under policies promoted by democrats than by republicans. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
He said a lot of false things. The only aspect that’s debatable is if he did so intentionally or did shoddy research. Either way, he’s promulgating falsehoods.
He smeared most panhandlers as scam artists when scientific study has shown that the vast majority are not. He claims that there is insufficient housing for the homeless because of zoning. Scientific study has shown that the vacancy rate is much greater than the number of homeless people. You are objectively wrong.
And what are they but, for the most part greedy rich people who largely don’t work. If they can’t afford to house homeless people, they should get jobs.
If homeless people who are truly homeless would ask for help, they may get the help they need. Holding signs advertising distress and yet claiming not to make people give them money makes the people doing it look like con/scam artists.
Only to an idiot who thinks John Stossel has more credibility than a university study that says that most make no more than $34 a day and use the money for food.
As someone who lived eight years and three months in the NYC homeless shelter system before I got help, I say you’re talking pie in the sky.
Hilarious that you mention InfoWars here when you previously admitted that Alex Jones is a propaganda artist when I said that John Stossel was. You’re so full of shit, you can’t even keep your story straight.
You took that comment out-of-context. When Alex Jones is right, credit should be given when and where it is due. When he is wrong, I don’t waste my time with him. I approach John Stossel the same way.
I posted evidence and you haven’t. That proves I am right. You’re effectively posting your feelings. As your hero, Ben Shapiro, says, “Facts don’t care about your feelings.”
rasgnarsbhut says, “Duh…. syunitific studies are of no relevance.” I bet you’re a climate change denialist, too. Rich right-wingers publicly deny climate change, and you are their tools. If you looked ast what they’re actually doing in terms of what they are investing in and not investing in, you can tell that they know climate change is real.
I presented the facts that every actual case of voter fraud has been perpetrated by a Republican–eleven of them, in fact. Those facts don’t care about your feelings, but you don’t want them to be true, so you’ve declared them lies. You’re no different from the scum that pretends that my medical documentation is fraudulent because they don’t want to believe that it’s true.
But one you lionize, and the other you demonize because you have no morals. Capitalists choose to live off the labor of others. Welfare recipients can survive on the meager amount the government gives them and have no other choice.
Capitalists take money from the people who earn it. When the government takes money from capitalists and and provides food benefits to the workers, that’s restorative justice.
I’ve read Capitalism and Freedom, which is absolute garbage. I’ve mentioned all of them from time to time on my blog and never had anything good to say about any of them. You ought to be able to find my comments by googling my name with theirs.
Bullshit. It protects people from wage theft, which is an extremely common crime. I’ve watched court cases that actually made it to trial. The workers won.
93, 000, 000 people out of the workforce under Barack Obama says otherwise. The only reason people can get away with saying that Barack Obama was so great is because their jobs were not actively taken.
You demonstrated that you don’t understand how rational arguments work when you insisted that the John Stossel videos were reasonable evidence for your point even after I showed you why his evidence is flimsy and anecdotal.
No, it depends on the slant of the people who sign the paycheck, which is pretty much always right of center. Even TYT has proved itself right of center.
Seriously, search my blog. Almost everything, if not everything, I have said about Biden has been negative, but that is also the case for Trump.
Trump is a criminal who shouldn’t even be allowed to vote, let alone be president. He has multiple credible rape accusations, fomenting an insurrection on January 6, and there’s the emoluments clause…
Libertarians believe in the freedom of the rich to enslave the poor. All capitalism is is “he who has the gold (capital) makes the rules.” Capitalism is evil.
He went to prison for over donating money to a political campaign. What is truly laughable is that the money equals speech crowd want to limit campaign contributions by law.
No, the people who want to limit campaign contributions don’t believe that money equals speech. As Moynihan said, you’re entitled to your own opinions but are not entitled to your own facts.
Interesting that I was able to show you twelve cases of voter fraud committed by Republicans while you’ve shown zero committed by Democrats but insist that only Democrats commit voter fraud. When what you insist is contrary to the evidence, it proves that you are irrational.
I wasn’t citing the media. I was citing a YouTube video that was citing specialists on Nazi Germany and passages from Mein Kampf that contradict Crowder’s claims that Hitler was a Marxist. Hitler specifically stated he was opposed to Marx’s ideas.
Karl Marx lived from 1818 to 1883. Hitler wasn’t even born until 1889. and became chancellor in 1933. It’s hilarious how much someone with no knowledge of history pontificates,
What we have with the electoral college is a tyranny of a minority. That needs to be eliminated. 30% of the country controls 60% of the Senate. That’s not right either. The electoral college was created for the sole purpose of preserving slavery. It should never have existed to begin with.
Well, people are constantly being screwed over as it stands. Hundreds of thousands of people are going to be made homeless over the latest SCOTUS decision.
Yes, it is, and if you looked up the definitions of left-wing and right-wing in any political science textbook, you would understand why that is true. And you would also understand that Biden’s positions are all far-right, e.g. crime bill, student debt, border policy, foreign policy, etc.
No, you’re talking about businesses that complain that people don’t want to work for the wage they’re paying–those are whiners. Most of the developed world pays for higher education through taxation.
Nazis were not socialists. They sheepdogged the socialists into the part ands exterminated them during the Night of the Long Knives. Learn history. Start with the CSUN article to which I just linked you.
I already showed you the video showing Steven Crowder lying through his teeth about Canadian health care and then try to generalize those lies to all socialized medicine. John Stossel couldn’t be honest about how much vacancy there is in san Francisco in order to demonize government that is answerable to the people in favor of private corporations answerable to no one.
So, to you, when Steven Crowder goes to a blood test clinic without an appointment and can’t get a doctor but omits that the clinic’s website states that they can get you a doctor if you request one in advance, you believe that he is being upfront and honest.
Explain why you believe it was honest for Crowder to complain that he couldn’t see a doctor at the blood clinic while withholding the fact that the clinic has a procedure to see a doctor that he didn’t want to follow. If he has talked about how he didn’t like the procedure, that would have been honest, but he presented it as though you can’t see a doctor at that clinic, which is a lie. He also complained about Canadian clinics being closed on weekends, implying that U.S. clinics are normally open on weekends, which the debunking video showed is not typical either where Crowder lives or in Mesa, Arizona, the most Republican-leaning city. How is that honest?
You’re delusional He lost 60 court cases before federal judges he appointed because he couldn’t provide evidence. Anyone who pretends that Trump won the election should be locked up for treason.
Anybody who claims that George W. Bush alone was responsible for the shit show in Iraq who does not look at the fact that the U.S. Congress went along with it should accuse the government at large, excluding the Judicial branch, of war crimes.
Outside of legitimate medical disabilities that make certain lines of work impractical, even impossible, people who stand on street corners holding signs advertising states of hardship and asking for handouts via panhandling are just looking for excuses to be lazy. The same is true for people who claim to be on welfare and use that as license to demand free stuff.
You never have any evidence. You right-wingers just act on what you want to believe. You don’t even have any principles. You think voter fraud is only bad if it helps Democrats, when all documented cases have helped Republicans. You claim that the second amendment gives the right to everyone to own a gun but were silent when Philando Castille was murdered by a cop for legal possession of a handgun. You claim to support states’ rights, but applauded Trump when he struck down California having stricter environmental legislation than other states. You’re all just a bunch of big liars who invoke principles you don’t actually when it fits with your extremist agenda.
In what way is it wrong? What has Trump done to help the non-rich? You probably still think he saved that Carrier plant in Indiana. The reality is that the jobs still went to Mexico.
Because of our tax code being unfriendly to business growth. We tax and regulate businesses to the point where the leave and then politicians complain about the lack of jobs?
Now you’re posting ad hominems. I’m still waiting for a shred of evidence for anything that you say. The fact that I provide evidence while you provide ad hominems proves to all rational people that I am correct.
Says someone who keeps consistently demonstrating that he is completely incapable of rational thought. You probably say that because you flunked out of school.
War is pure, unadulterated theft from the American people. Health care paid through taxation is reinvesting in the American people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn5JRKWgnps
If goods and/or services are provided free of charge on a voluntary basis, I have no problem with it being classified as free stuff on that basis. Other than that, people who want free stuff on-demand on the basis that they cannot afford that which they want are just being lazy.
First of all, things paid for with public funds are not “Free stuff” and the only people who call it that are people who oppose public money being used for that person.
Only a twisted, evil pervert thinks not being able to afford necessities is caused by laziness. As I previously mentioned, minimum wage at full time can’t get a 1-bedroom apartment in 93% of the country. No intelligent person thinks people in low-wage jobs are lazy. As previously mentioned, the job market is absolute crap, and that isn’t the fault of anyone except greedy capitalists.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, people who use college as license to party are part of the problem. They also elect to pursue stupid shit like arts degrees instead of things conducive to employment after they graduate.
No, it’s a fact. Outside of an economic depression, which I will concede makes finding a job difficult, people who go to college and can’t find good jobs after they graduate probably pursued useless stuff while in college.
Volunteering and employment are two different things. I became homeless because Social Security says that I can do a desk job, and therefore, cannot receive Disability. The capitalist class has decided otherwise.
Plenty of people with arts degrees have jobs; the fact that the fields are competitive and that nepotism plays a huge role in who gets hired does not make this untrue.
I don’t know if I can read them without being on Facebook. To be honest, I have no interest in being on a social media platform the arbitrarily censors opposing viewpoints.
So the talking heads claim. I am no fan of his, however, if Mark Zuckerberg said that Facebook would only censor people for deliberately violating Facebook’s terms and conditions for use, not based solely on ideological differences, I could take that seriously.
You’ve made it abundantly clear why you insist Stossel is not a liar. Anyone that says what you want to believe has to e telling the truth in your eyes. You need serious mental help. And you’re being told that by someone who was homeless for eight years and three months and whose rent is paid by city money.
I already said that about you, dimwit. Remember, I’ve had seven clean mental health checks while I was homeless and only got a positive when bias was intentionally introduced.
By claiming that only the individual benefits from education, you are clearly not understanding me, or trying to get me to agree to something I never claimed.
Not true. But since you’re going to use that logic, then people who aren’t benefitting from their college degrees should have their debt annulled, right? You said it should be paid for only by those who benefit.
But you just said that those who don’t benefit form college shouldn’t have to pay for it. I earned two degrees but remain in poverty; therefore, by your logic, I should not have to pay for it.
We agree on something. Some people have said that the refund should also mean a revoking of my degree. I can’t agree with that. I did the work necessary to get the degree.
Due to a complex medical situation, something I was born with, it keeps me from being able to pursue college. Even if it did not, nobody would owe me that opportunity.
If some people choose not to go to college, why should they pay for other people to go if there is no biological relationship between the people in question.
Since you were probably too lazy to click the link, here it is: Bernie Sanders : “The Boomer generation needed just 306 hours of minimum wage work to pay for four years of public college. Millennials need 4,459. The economy today is rigged against working people and young people. That is what we are going to change.”
If you think someone should have to work 4,459 hours just to get the funding for an arts degree rather than have it paid for as the public good that it is, you are a depraved fool.
ROTFLMAO! The Libertarian Party is all about freedom for those with capital and screwing over everyone else. They’re opposed to all public spending and want to end public schools.
Because government spending has gotten out of control. What is so bad about eliminating public schools? Nothing in our Founding Documents says anything about our having a right to a taxpayer-funded education at any level.
The founding fathers also claimed the right to own people. Only a true thief would deny education to a child because their parents’ can’t pay for it. Like I said before, you have zero right to complain if a store short-changes you because you didn’t want to contribute to the education of the staff.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, modern academia is an abomination. People are indoctrinated into the belief that they are victims without even contemplating how they can alter their own life paths to avoid being victims.
How the fuck would you know? You already admitted you weren’t even competent enough to stay in school. Have you ever considered that whoever told you that was indoctrinating you with lies? Because that’s what they were doing.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, due to medical/health issues, college is not in my foreseeable future. Competence has nothing to do with it. I prefer to read stuff online or get into The Great Courses. More educational and less costs long-term than college tuition.
Reading and watching videos is not the same as classroom education.
My medical issues limit me to desk work, and because of the income cliff the city set up with the housing voucher program, I’ve had to pretty much give up looking for work because making local minimum wage ($15 an hour at full time) makes one too wealthy to remain in the housing voucher program, but too poor to afford any housing here without help.
Given the general lack of response to my job applications over the past twenty years, I have no confidence in the capitalist class to respond to them at any greater rate than they did previously, which was under 1%, particularly with the way I’ve been informed that the ATS most large companies use mangle my resume in a way no one has ever been able to help me thwart.
I literally had someone tell me I’d have an easier time finding work if I went back to school for a bachelor’s degree in communication studies, but since I earned one of those in 1999, I find that claim incredibly laughable. She didn’t realize I had because Facebook allows you to put only one major, and I had a double major, which took an extra year to complete. I put English because of the two majors, it’s generally considered the more difficult.
Absolutely I am. Capitalism helps the capitalists, generally at the expense pf everyone else. Why should children of the poor be denied an education so that they can stay poor in a society where most living-wage jobs require credentials, not to mention the overall benefits of being educated and living in an educated society? Capitalism basically says, “I’m better than you because I have capital.” It’s a very evil philosophy.
I can show you lots pf videos showing you how morally bankrupt capitalism is. Every video I’ve seen claiming that socialism was morally bankrupt either outright lied or claimed that all bad things done by nominally “socialist” countries were inherent to socialism, whereas bad things done by capitalist countries are never inherent to capitalism.
I will not argue the fact that Capitalist systems are not immune from a certain set of problems. What are your thoughts on Social Democracies around the world?
Scott Andrew Hutchins, I will not argue that point. Having said that, I will argue that the only way perfect equality can be achieved is if everyone was equally poor.
And that is a total bullshit argument. If all wealth were divided equally, everyone would have $32,000, which would help more than 3/4 of the people on the planet.
Tell that to people who sit on street corners with cigarettes in one hand and holding signs advertising a need of help. They don’t want or need help. All they are looking for is a way to satisfy their addictions.
Bullshit. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about and need to shut up. You don’t even know any homeless people, so you just came up with a hypothetical far-right stereotype.
He has illustrated the fact that there are both con/scam artists and that there are some who truly need help. In the Freeloaders: Panhandling video, only one guy who was offered a job to do lawn work actually showed up.
And I showed you info that scientifically demonstrated that scammers are extremely rare. Stossel uses a dishonest strategy called “undue weight.” He also claimed that San Francisco doesn’t have enough vacant property to house the homeless, also a demonstrable lie.
I’ve experienced and witnessed it, and I write about it extensively on this blog. You know it’s not propaganda because the mainstream media doesn’t discuss it.
The people who put in the time to create signs advertising states of hardship in order to con other people out of their money should have as much time to try to find work.
The portion of people who do that is so infinitesimal that it’s not worth worrying yourself. That’s been proven in a scientific study to which I already linked you.
You are using the logical fallacy known as “cherry picking.”
You clearly missed the point. If there are people who are on the streets holding signs advertising states of hardship that were handmade, they probably have the time to try to find work. People who are on the streets who appear to be genuinely desperate and starving are a separate matter.
Based on my experiences and the people I knew in the shelter system, they’re doing what they’re doing because their efforts have finding jobs have not gotten them anywhere. And don’t go talking about the pandemic, either. Stossel first ran this story when I was still a teenager (1990s). Even under a lot of makeup, he doesn’t look as young as he does in this video, made when he was in his thirties.
I just sent you a video debunking his “5 socialism myths video” which shows how he lies, makes contradictory statements to fit his agenda, and thinks juxtaposing photographs proves broad-sweeping ideological points. It’s really pathetic. For example, he defines socialism as government nationalizing business, claims that video of Maduro with a megaphone declaring that a certain business is being seized by the government proves that Venezuela is a socialist country, but denies that Scandinavian countries are socialist even though they have far greater nationalization of industry than Venezuela does. So when he says “socialism,” it just means whatever he wants to demonize because he can’t keep a consistent definition from moment to moment.
He has told the truth from his experience that the Canadian health care system sucks. He has told the truth about the morally corrupt and ass-backwards ideology of Socialism.
You’re so brainwashed that you can’t tell lies from the truth. Even when Crowder is shown blatantly contradicting his sources, you insist that he’s not lying.
You’re a lying sack of shit. You think it’s honest to take a Gregor Strasse quote and attribute it to Hitler when Hitler had Strasse murdered? That’s just the first example of something Crowder lied about.
Not when what they were under was nothing like what Marx described. People who grew up under capitalism also have greater credibility in describing its evils.
You do realize that Marx wanted the government to wither away to just a few basic functions. I’m not sure why you right-wingers insist that Marx was for big government. It’s so easily disproven.
If everyone spends money at one point or another, with the rich having greater disposable assets and having more spending money, how is a sales tax regressive if theycan afford the greater expenditures?
Because they have fewer necessities they need to buy. $100 is a lot of money to a poor person. It’s not a lot of money to a rich person. The tax is much more painful to the poor. I do, on the other hand, support luxury taxes.
At no point in the video is there any example of the media distorting Crowder’s reporting. That’s how I know you’re either a liar, a mental case, or both.
If you watched that video, you would know that it showed Steven Crowder speak in his own words. Clearly you are lying about having watched the video or you have no brain.
All of the Steven Crowder videos I have seen indicate otherwise. Watch his Youtube videos on his channel in as much detail as possible and then tell me he is full of it.
Why would I do that after watching a video that was literally letting Steven Crowder talk, then putting it on pause and showing how he lied. In that case he was demonstrating that Crowder was lying about Hitler being a socialist/leftist. So Crowder would say Hitler believed one thing, and the narrator would cite a passage in Mein Kampf in which Hitler said exactly the opposite. Then he would play video of Crowder saying what the Nazis did that was supposedly socialist, then showing passage in history books saying that the Nazis did just the opposite. If you had watched the video, you would have seen clearly that Crowder is a liar in the extreme.
Nazis were not socialist even though they used it in the name. This is explained in great detail in the video I posted. If you also look on Wikipedia, it says that they are an extreme-right movement, murdered socialists during the Night of the Long Knives, and were not, in practice, socialists.
And you think mass murder is inherently left-wing? You realize that the United States commits mass murder? The number of people Stalin killed has been grossly exaggerated, largely based on Nazi propaganda, and is lower than far-right Pinochet.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, Left-leaning types seem to either have a pro-abortion or pro-choice mentality regarding the lives of the unborn. However, ax murderers are those that they believe are undeserving of the death penalty.
Masses of cells are not human beings. That said, I don’t support late-term abortion. It is impossible for an ethical person to support the death penalty. Once the threat has been neutralized, there is no justification for it. Worse still, studies, including one by the National Academy of Sciences, have shown that four out of every hundred people executed have been later proven innocent. That fact alone should be enough to make any ethical person want there to be a moratorium on the death penalty when even initiatives like The Innocence Project fail to save innocent people in four out of every hundred institutions. No amount of reform has been able to reduce this number; therefore, if you support the death penalty, you think that it’s OK to kill innocent people to keep it going in spite of the threat being neutralized. Anyone who finds that acceptable is extremely evil.
That seems to be what you’re saying, actually. Right-wingers tend not to give a shit about anybody once they’re born because the reality is that they want to control women, just like Hitler executed women for getting abortions.
Both parties support genocide in Palestine and other countries. It’s Republicans and self-described “conservative Democrats” like Biden always beating the drums for war.
You consider it honest and trustworthy to take a quote out of a pamphlet written by someone murdered by Hitler and attribute it to Hitler to fit your agenda.
You did when you said Steven Crowder was honest and trustworthy, and when you claimed to have watched the video I posted debunking Crowder’s claim that Hitler was a socialist. The very first point in the video was showing that Crowder did this.
If Al Gore is so concerned about climate change or other issues, he should stop using vehicles that produce emissions that are pollutants. Otherwise, he is a hypocrite.
Yes. He could have paid his workers quadruple what he did and still turn a profit. Instead, he chose to spend the money on a personal gestapo because he was a fascist who wanted total control over his workers’ lives.
If my homelessness is my fault, then any parent who asks their kid to call them if their going to be late is at fault if the kid doesn’t call and shows up late.
But you don’t understand the concept because you keep using circular reasoning (of which begging the question is a form), which is one of the most basic of the fallacies.
I see you didn’t watch the video. third world countries aren’t poor. they have been plundered by capitalists. That poverty they experience is a direct result of capitalism.
Look at what companies like DeBeers and Nestle do in the third world, and you’ll see capitalism at the root of all poverty. Then there are the capitalists like Coca-Cola that outright murdered people in Colombia for unionizing.
And in this country look how the houses are being bought up for far more than they’re worth to corner the market and increase the homeless population for a profit.
Just because some people want to call certain things facts does not make them facts. Example: If a highly caffeinated beverage is consumed late at night, it is a fact that said person who consumed it may endure a night of sleeplessness. It is an opinion if someone says he or she prefers a caffeinated beverage like Coca-Cola to coffee.
Yes, Watch that documentary. Microsoft’s claims to have switched to green energy is meaningless because they’re using more fossil fuels to create that energy than they would if they just used the fossil fuels.
All evidence is to the contrary. It’s red states like Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Kentucky that are some of the most egregious offenders in that area.
SO all these sites they say Louisiana gets more money from the federal government than any other state are all lying? Again, why haven’t thy lost libel cases?
Again, there is no double standard. It is fundamentally dishonest to compare a clump of cells with electrical impulses to a human being. You might as well criminalize menstruation and ejaculation outside of a vagina.
Meaningless. Again, that video is Steve Crowder in his own words, with the narrator pausing to insert the truth every time Crowder lies. Here is a tweet showing Crowder making that same lie: https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/status/929933366736060417
You’re seriously claiming that Mein Kampf has been revised after Hitler’s death and that Uwe Oster, Germa Bel, Hugh Trevor-Roper, Ian Kershaw, Theodore Roper, et al. are all secret Nazis, and that the actual Nazi pamphlets Three Arrows shows that show that their ideals are all right-wing are all forged? That’s an extraordinary claim and requires extraordinary evidence. Crowder provides absolutely none, and neither have you.
Yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives The article has 79 footnotes from 36 sources, including entire books just devoted to the one event, which took place June 30-July 2, 1934. Nazis regularly sent socialists and communists to concentration camps when discovered. Since they had legal immunity to break into homes and search people, communists, socialists, and trade unionists were the first people sent to concentration camps. The first concentration camp, Dachau, was built in March 1933 as a prison for such people, declared enemies of the state long before the extermination of Jews, Roma, and gays. https://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/7257172.horrors-of-auschwitz/
Because there has been a massive blockade for decades. Cuba developed several COVID-19 vaccines that they can’t administer because of a lack of syringes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djj84ooaJCs
Literally the only people who use the term free are Republicans to disparage those on the left who think taxpayer money should be used to benefit the taxpayer.
No, I woke up from delusion. I thought I was a conservative during the Clinton years, but I was really against neoliberalism. My excuse is that I was only 16 when he was elected.
ROTFLMAO! If you were not too lazy to follow the links, you’d get a thorough answer. Briefly, it means that you are asserting two claims are true without providing evidence for either one but saying that one proves the other when neither have been proven. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning in which the two premises are the same claim or nearly the same claim.
The people of most countries would never allow a scaling back of nationalized health care. In the United States, the mainstream media is so far-right that none of the major media outlets would cover the Medicare for All Marches in 100 cities, but they’ll cover a Tea Party rally with 20 people.
Circular reasoning is making up two things and claiming that they prove each other. There’s no logic to it. Begging the question is when you make one claim and try to prove it with the same or similar claim, e.g. your claim that Steven Crowder is truthful because you believe him. That’s not evidence that Steven Crowder is truthful.
His bad experiences with the Canadian healthcare system may be anomalous, however, are you going to deny the fact that no system of medical care is perfect?
But you think a guy like Steven Crowder making all sorts pf claims he doesn’t back up with evidence is credible. Your criteria for determining credibility is extremely flawed, illogical, and irrational.
Again, watch the video I posted earlier in the thread that you’ve repeatedly failed to describe accurately, said you watched but later admitted you didn’t, and basically made yourself look like an ass to anyone who did.
The video is literally Steven Crowder saying what he thinks Hitler believed and passages from Mein Kampf that completely contradict Crowder’s claims, then video of Crowder claiming that the Nazis did certain things that are then disproven by multiple history books, pamphlets and newspapers of the time, etc.
Obviously you’re completely incapable of learning. Nazis were not socialists. Nazis murdered socialists, first in concentration camps, then on the night of the Long Knives, they murdered those whom they had sheepdogged into the party. Nazis were extreme capitalists.
According to http://www.wikipedia.org, Nazism, officially National Socialism, , is the ideology and practices associated with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP, or National Socialist German Workers’ Party in English) in Nazi Germany. During Hitler’s rise to power in 1930s Europe, it was frequently referred to as Hitlerism. The later related term “Neo-Nazism” is applied to other far-right groups with similar ideas which formed after the collapse of the Nazi regime. Nazism is a form of fascism, with disdain for liberal democracy and the parliamentary system. It incorporates fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, scientific racism, and the use of eugenics into its creed. Its extreme nationalism originated in pan-Germanism and the ethno-nationalist Völkisch movement which had been a prominent aspect of German nationalism since the late 19th century, and it was strongly influenced by the Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged after Germany’s defeat in World War I, from which came the party’s underlying “cult of violence.” Nazism subscribed to pseudo-scientific theories of a racial hierarchy and social Darwinism, identifying the Germans as a part of what the Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous German society based on racial purity which represented a people’s community (Volksgemeinschaft). The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum and exclude those who they deemed either Community Aliens or “inferior” races.
By your logic, buffalo wings come from buffalos. Apart from the name, there is absolutely nothing here that describes socialism nor says that Nazism was a socialist system. Again, the name was to sheepdog socialists in the party in order to kill them.
A lot less biased than yours. Did you see the cop talking about the people in MAGA hats beating the shit out of him and calling him the N-word that Trump said was given hugs and kisses?
Again, the cop’s own words. You right-wingers always trust cops unless it’s convenient. You’ve proven Blue Lives Matter is a racist movement by failing to support the Capitol Police officers recovering from their injuries on January 6.
Right-wingers have been taking footage where BLM activists were attacked and fought back, edited to not show the attack, then falsely attributed to other BLM rallies. Just like Israel used falsely described video to pretend victimhood a few months back.
But when you delete the instigation to make others look violent, that’s dishonest, as is using one video and pretending it’s multiple different rallies.
And what would you do in a socialist society. Not like you would be working. You would be sat on your fat ass doing nothing but complaining about things ok the internet all day.
Full of shit as usual. Are you done impersonating my sister-in-law and nephew?
“If people don’t want to interview you, that means your lazy!” Logic that makes people with Down syndrome look smarter than you are.
Says the person using a 15 year old photo
Number one, the photo is not 15 years old. Number two, even if it were, there’s no way you could know that without cyberstalking me.
then hold is it?
and it’s quite obvious old when you post other photos of yourself here, dude
You’re a clown.
Atleast people with Down syndrome can get a job, what is your problem exactly? Ableist much?
The only ableist person here is you. when have you seen a person with Down syndrome in a desk job?
It’s stated very clearly on my about page that I have numerous physical challenges that limit me to a desk job, and that Social Security has denied me three times on the grounds that I can do a desk job. That requires someone willing to interview me for one, Over 60 people have attempted to help me improve my resume, not one has succeeded in making one that gets me good results. And then there are the idiots like you who claim that I’m applying to jobs for which I’m not qualified–claims that they can’t back up when given examples.
Your masters degree is toilet paper and again at least someone with Down syndrome has a job. I don’t pity anyone with 250k in the bank who uses up resources someone without two nickels to rub together could be using.
“If a pERsOn WItH dOWn sYnDroMe Can staNd FOr EIghT HouRS A DaY, wHy CAn’T somEONe PHYsiCAlLy diSaBleD Do The SAMe?”
“wHeN YOU bLOw AlL THaT moNey on REnt beCAiSE YOU HAve no waY TO rePlENIsH it, it wIL PrOVe to THe EmplOYerS wHO AlREaDY Won’T inTErvIEW you thAT You cAn’T MaNagE moNeY!”
And I do not have 250k in the bank. Not even close.
You can’t think, and you can’t spell.
I can’t spell, but I got a desk job and my drivers license. How about you? You are just an old man with a dated degree who sits and rants on the internet all day about:Bowel movements, how women don’t like you, your mother, a moving company and capitalism. Time better spent job hunting.
I’m not an old man. I have a driver’s license. My degree is not dated. It’s pointless to look for a job because I will be made homeless if I take most jobs. I’m not allowed to make more than $25,760, which is less than local minimum wage at full time, or I lose my voucher and my $2,000 apartment, which is typical for the area because employers and real estate owners are out of touch with reality.
The fact that you come here and punch down when the richest man in the world just got given a $3 billion subsidy by the government shows that your life is so pathetic and empty that you need to be a bully to feel good about yourself.
And just because I have a driver’s license doesn’t mean that I can do a driving job. sitting with my legs in one position causes me shooting pain in my legs that make me a distracted driver. this first happened on a drive back from Fayetteville where I made a documentary shoot. It still happens regularly. If it happens in a chair, it affects only me. If it happens when I’m driving, it makes me a distracted driver. That along with my bathroom issues. Anyone who thinks someone with an advanced degree should have to wear a diaper to do a job already unsuitable to them is one sick fuck and should be forced to pay my student loan debt.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, outside of hard circumstances due to no fault of one’s own or legitimate disabilities that make certain lines of work impractical, even impossible, people who live on the streets are their because of decisions of their own making.
You’re wrong, and the evidence is not on your side.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, here are 2 videos for you: 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHoiVnID8vY, 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9pgh5EO6lw These people choose to be in the situations that they are in.
Are you familiar with the concept of the anecdotal evidence fallacy?
Scott Andrew Hutchins, yes, I am. Are you familiar with people whose stories are only told to con us out of our money?
As though wealthy people don’t do that all the time…
Scott Andrew Hutchins, your point is conceded.
The vast majority of people with problems stereotypically associated with homelessness (addiction and mental illness) are housed, and statistics show that those are more common among the very wealthy than the poor.
Scott Andrew Hutchins,what is to be done with the fakers of their situations?
This isn’t common, any more than voter fraud is–just a right-wing boogeyman.
Scott Andrew Hutchins,are you saying that voter fraud is not a thing?
According to MIT, it happens in 0.00006% of cases. Right-wingers use it as a boogeyman in order to disenfranchise legitimate voters unlikely to vote for them.
In the words of the 5th circuit Court of Appeals, it’s “virtually nonexistent.” https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Briefing_Memo_Debunking_Voter_Fraud_Myth.pdf
Scott Andrew Hutchins, re-watch the videos I linked. They are not propaganda.
They are most definitely propaganda. Stossel has trotted out that panhandling story at least once a year since he recorded it 30 years ago, and it’s been seriously debunked by multiple studies: https://archive.thinkprogress.org/everything-you-think-you-know-about-panhandlers-is-wrong-36b41487730d/ .
Just like Prager University, Stossel is trying to fire up gullible haters to keep our rotten system going that funnels all the wealth to lazy shits like him.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, what about the lazy people who sit or stand on street corners asking for handouts who are able to work but choose not to? Read the comments sections for each video.
Being able to work and being able to find a potential employer willing to interview you, let alone hire you, especially if you don’t have an address, are two different things. If you were more intelligent, you would have thought of this, particularly considering to whom you’re talking. If they’re sitting rather than standing, there is an especially good chance that there are no positions they can do available to them.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, if you are ever conned out of your money by a seemingly homeless person who is only trying to line his or her own pocket, don’t say that you have not been warned. People who appear to be truly starving are those who need help. Those on the street corners who appear to be perfectly healthy otherwise holding signs advertising hardship are probably liars.
Or they could be living in a homeless shelter, jackass.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, reread the perfectly healthy part again.
How the FUCK do you know if someone is perfectly healthy? My disabilities aren’t readily visible, and plenty of idiots think I’m faking because it’s a nerve issue that varies depending upon my exertion level.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, some people may just put on a brave front and not advertise their situations.
Panhandling is protective speech under the first amendment. Demonizing panhandlers as scam artists when serious studies have shown that the vast majority are not and use the money for food just makes you sound like an asshole.
Campaign finance contributions in any amount should be protected as free speech. It is not, so your point is invalid.
You believe that the rich should have a right to buy elections. You are depraved.
Here is a video for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRnoSL3girI Watchit and you will see the hypocrisy in the argument.
I didn’t make the argument that you’re claiming that I did.
My apologies. I misinterpreted that comment.
You equated asking for money with spending money on illegal things. This is not a rational comparison. Panhandling is much more similar to those ads I see on YouTube with Israeli parents begging for money because their kid has a rare disease (considering that Israel has universal health care, an ad for St. Jude might be a more valid comparison.
If you can provide a better comparison that is based in fact, I will be glad to look into it.
Equating asking for money with using money for illegal purposes is an incredibly illogical comparison on your part. If people can go on TV, radio, online asking for money, why not in person?
Scott Andrew Hutchins, here is another video for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e50fQLyebI People who use their status as welfare recipients to demand free stuff are lazy.
Wrong again, asswipe! The dishonest Fox propagandist won’t stop interrupting her to throw her off her train of thought.
Capitalists are lazyasses to hire others top do their actual work and take all the credit.
If businesses are going to make college degrees minimum barriers for obtaining employment, they should pay for it through taxation so that they can’t pick and choose who gets educated. It really is that simple.
Turn of Fox, you are rotting your mind with propaganda. Also watch the documentary, The Brainwashing of My Dad.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, she has no rational argument. Just an “I’m entitled to free shit because I can’t afford it” mentality.
That is completely false. It’s because you’re too out of touch with reality to understand that people are now put in a situation that going to college is the only way for most people to have even a chance vat a decent job, but for ,many of us, we complete college and simply aren’t given a chance by the business class to have one of these better jobs, so we’re ion a mountain of debt with nothing to show for it based on the whims of others. She has a rational argument. You do not.
Unless provided voluntarily, nobody has any right to free stuff on-demand. Try pursuing a useful degree and that will help employment opportunities. The only reason college graduates can’t find jobs in some cases is due to degree choices.
As long as corporate welfare and wars of choice for the benefit of private contractors exist, we absolutely do have the right to get things we want from our tax money.
Now you sound like the imbeciles who are always telling me that I should have majored in engineering despite math being one of the few things in school I wasn’t good at other than gym and industrial arts and getting a 620 verbal and 490 math on the SAT in 1993.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, people who talk about wanting free shit on-demand are just wanting to mooch off of the taxpayers. Free college? Free health care? Goddammit, that shit is not even remotely free and these idiots know it.
Only a lying sack of shit would call this mooching off the taxpayers. Next, you’re going to call free K-12 mooching off the tax payers because you want an uneducated and easily controllable populace because you’re a fascist who thinks that the wealth should belong to an elite few. Your point of view is absolute garbage and needs to be called out as such. If these things were free, we wouldn’t be calling them to be paid for using the ridiculous amounts of taxpayer money that are used for wars of choice, corporate welfare, and mass incarceration fir victimless crimes like weed possession. It is abundantly clear that you are a pathological liar and a thief.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, the democrats gave us the evils of slavery, theft of our labor via the implementation of the federal income tax, theft of land from Native-American tribes. More people have been in poverty under policies promoted by democrats than by republicans. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
That has not be true in nearly a century, and you know it. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Essays/Keeping-the-Faith/Party-Realignment–New-Deal/
Scott Andrew Hutchins, that is what modern day democrats would have you believe.
You’re probably one of the psychos who thinks Trump won by a landslide in 2020.
Because he did. Voter fraud and foreign interference is the only reason we are faced with a slack-jawed bumbling idiot right now.
You are a fucking mental case. There is literally no evidence Trump won the election. Right-wingers are all emotion, no logic.
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55016029
https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evidence-voter-fraud-guide-statistical-claims-about-2020-election
https://mitsloan.mit.edu/press/mit-sloan-survey-examines-false-beliefs-about-voter-fraud-2020-presidential-election
You might as well, have said, “Duhhhh… I is smarter then NE dum MIT syuntist!”
No, genius. The democrats are more mentally unstable than republicans.
You have zero evidence for that.
Wrong.
Ragnarsbhut says, “Duhhh… I is smarter then NE dum MIT syunist.”
You are still wrong.
Liar.
B.S. artist.
I haven’t lied about anything, you have.
No, you have.
I provided evidence. You did not. Ergo, you are a liar.
If search engines like google stopped censorship tactics, that may help.
It’s not my job to look up YOUR evidence, or rather lack thereof.
Whatever.
It’s not my fault you don’t know how to debate. Seriously, all you do is state your feelings that aren’t bolstered by any facts.
I see I will not be able to convince you.
“When you say, “I’m right, and MIT is wrong,” you look like an idiot.
As if you are a contemporary equivalent to Albert Einstein.
https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/
I scored in the 98th percentile on my cognitive skills test.
OK.
If you had evidence, you would have posted things that couldn’t be so easily debunked.
If Google and these so-called search engines would cut the censorship b.s., I would be very likely to share multiple sources.
KuKluxKlan.com or some shit, most likely.
Not at all.
Yeah, Stormfront, their cover…
Really?
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/23/949751583/some-right-wing-media-air-segments-to-rebut-their-own-claims-of-voter-fraud
I will get my news from http://www.townhall.com, http://www.breitbart.com, http://www.infowars.com and http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com as those are more reliable news outlets.
100% pure propaganda.
No, not at all.
You have no ability to discern reasonable sources, as demonstrated by your failure to understand the debunkings of the John Stossel videos you posted.
He seems to be reliable.
This proves that you are incapable of rational thought because I demonstrated above how he lied and cherry-picked.
That is debatable.
He said a lot of false things. The only aspect that’s debatable is if he did so intentionally or did shoddy research. Either way, he’s promulgating falsehoods.
Not really.
He smeared most panhandlers as scam artists when scientific study has shown that the vast majority are not. He claims that there is insufficient housing for the homeless because of zoning. Scientific study has shown that the vacancy rate is much greater than the number of homeless people. You are objectively wrong.
Some of them are panhandlers.
That doesn’t even make sense as a response to my previous statement (non sequitur). Your “education” is really poor.
People who beg for money on street corners are just embarrassing themselves.
If people won’t hire hem, what choice do they have, dimwit?
They should have had the good sense to pursue useful degrees, not use college as license to party, drink or do drugs.
You’re repeating the same damn idiocy I called you out on before.
That is not a denial of my point.
All homelessness is caused by greedy rich capitalists. https://www.wsj.com/articles/thousands-of-working-new-yorkers-are-living-in-homeless-shelters-1491862238
The rich have nothing to do with that.
Absolutely wrong! They have everything to do with the high rents and low wages that cause homelessness.
No, the landlords and landladies who own the apartments are responsible for the rent charges.
And what are they but, for the most part greedy rich people who largely don’t work. If they can’t afford to house homeless people, they should get jobs.
If homeless people who are truly homeless would ask for help, they may get the help they need. Holding signs advertising distress and yet claiming not to make people give them money makes the people doing it look like con/scam artists.
Only to an idiot who thinks John Stossel has more credibility than a university study that says that most make no more than $34 a day and use the money for food.
As someone who lived eight years and three months in the NYC homeless shelter system before I got help, I say you’re talking pie in the sky.
Bullshit!
You might as well have just said that you got your information from Joseph Goebbels.
They are more reliable than Fox News, CNBC, CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, Salon magazine, The New York Times, to name a few examples.
You’ve got that ass-backwards again.
No, I don’t.
You keep saying that Democrats commit voter fraud. The evidence shows that it’s consistently Republicans committing voter fraud in the 0.0006% of cases that are proven true: https://www.businessinsider.com/voter-election-fraud-pennsylvania-charge-dead-mom-vote-trump-2020-12
The word for what you are doing is “lying.”
No, the media is just propagandizing you.
Says a guy who believes Koch-funded propaganda!
No.
Wrong again! https://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/alex-jones-paid-by-the-koch-brothers/
Smear campaign.
Hilarious that you mention InfoWars here when you previously admitted that Alex Jones is a propaganda artist when I said that John Stossel was. You’re so full of shit, you can’t even keep your story straight.
You took that comment out-of-context. When Alex Jones is right, credit should be given when and where it is due. When he is wrong, I don’t waste my time with him. I approach John Stossel the same way.
No you don’t because you keep spreading their lies in my comment section.
You delude yourself.
Says someone who still refuses to provide evidence for anything that he claims.
Look it up on reliable news outlets.
My job is not to look up your evidence. The news sources you call are not reliable, as they all have an extreme-right corporatist bias.
And your sources are unbiased?
No source is unbiased, but at least mine aren’t on the side of the big banks and mega-corporations and against the working class.
Which proves my point.
https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/vote-suppression/myth-voter-fraud
Voter fraud is not a myth or every deceased person or people who vote in one jurisdiction and then try for another would not be happening.
“Duh…. I is smarter then NE wun at Harvard or MIT.”–ragnarsbhut
I see that I will not convince you.
Not when all you can do is cite propaganda well known for being racist and fascist.
Ben Shapiro claims that facts don’t care about our feelings.
The facts show that you are wrong. All you do is select what you want to be true and find people who say that even when their evidence for it is shit.
No, they don’t.
I posted evidence and you haven’t. That proves I am right. You’re effectively posting your feelings. As your hero, Ben Shapiro, says, “Facts don’t care about your feelings.”
If you are posting links from unreliable sources, they are of no relevance.
rasgnarsbhut says, “Duh…. syunitific studies are of no relevance.” I bet you’re a climate change denialist, too. Rich right-wingers publicly deny climate change, and you are their tools. If you looked ast what they’re actually doing in terms of what they are investing in and not investing in, you can tell that they know climate change is real.
Climate change denialist? That’s funny.
Well, Trump is. You don’t agree with him on that?
I do think that climate issues should be of concern.
Then why do you consider propaganda financed by big polluters like the Koch Brothers “news?”
I am not interested in propaganda. Just cold hard facts.
Which you admitted you decode based on feelings. Facts you don’t like you dismiss as lies.
In my world, lies are lies and facts are facts.
Then why have you told more lies in your conversation with me than I can even count?
You are twisting things for your own benefit.
No, I’m not.
On the contrary.
Show me an example of where I did that.
Read your own comments and you will see for yourself.
The fact that you can’t show me a specific example just serves to show that you are lying.
Whatever.
That’s what you say when you know you’ve been beaten but don’t want to admit it.
Right.
I presented the facts that every actual case of voter fraud has been perpetrated by a Republican–eleven of them, in fact. Those facts don’t care about your feelings, but you don’t want them to be true, so you’ve declared them lies. You’re no different from the scum that pretends that my medical documentation is fraudulent because they don’t want to believe that it’s true.
If you vote democrat, that proves that you have even more mental health problems.
I vote Green whenever possible.
Same shit, different label.
False. Democrats are right of center. Greens are not.
Wrong.
if you think Democrats are left of center, you’re a blithering idiot.
Their actions and words suggest otherwise.
Only if you don’t know the definitions of left and right in a political context.
And you do?
Yes I do.
Right.
Let’s hear your definition of left politics.
Redistributive economics and class envy is a component. If I can’t have it, then you can’t have it. Stupid shit like that.
Wrong. It’s about justice. Capitalists profit on the backs of others’ labor.
Welfare recipients are also profiting on the labor of other people.
But one you lionize, and the other you demonize because you have no morals. Capitalists choose to live off the labor of others. Welfare recipients can survive on the meager amount the government gives them and have no other choice.
What the government gives them the government takes from the people who earn it.
Capitalists take money from the people who earn it. When the government takes money from capitalists and and provides food benefits to the workers, that’s restorative justice.
Bullshit!
It’s fact. Look at Walmart employees on SNAP. That’s money stolen from them by the Walton family.
What about money stolen from families that earn it and being redistributed to other people to buy votes?
Mythology
Wrong.
No, I’m very much correct.
Do you have any experience reading Walter Williams? F.A. Hayek? Thomas Sowell? Milton Friedman?
I’ve read Capitalism and Freedom, which is absolute garbage. I’ve mentioned all of them from time to time on my blog and never had anything good to say about any of them. You ought to be able to find my comments by googling my name with theirs.
Will look into it.
Libertarians like you adore legalized theft, so long as it’s the rich taking from the poor. That’s why you hate minimum wage laws.
Minimum wage laws are bullshit.
Only in the eyes of thieves and enslavers.
It only leads to regulatory overdrive.
Bullshit. It protects people from wage theft, which is an extremely common crime. I’ve watched court cases that actually made it to trial. The workers won.
Good for them.
Opponents of minimum wage laws are pro-slavery Nazis:
Merit-based systems of pay are more realistic than a system based on legal dictate.
ROTFLMAO! Who determines merit? The boss? Tantamount to slavery!
The employer(s) and employee(s) could meet and discuss the matter.
ROTFLMAO! That doesn’t work now unless there is a good union.
Self-employment is an option.
ROTFLMAO! We’ve discussed this before…
Either be self-employed and dictate your own hours and pay rate or be screwed over by a potential employer.
Nether is realistic for most people.
Is there any factual basis to that?
The average cost of starting one’s own business is $30,000, and over 70% of new businesses fail. That means it’s not practical for most people.
If we cut the regulatory b.s., that would help.
Bullshit!
You’re full of it!
You’re out of touch with reality.
No, genius. You are.
Says a guy who gets his info from people paid off by the Koch Brothers.
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/04/nearly-102-million-americans-do-not-have-a-job-right-now-worse-than-at-any-point-during-the-last-recession.html
Because of democrats’ economic policies, which are screwed up, more people were out-of-work under Barack Obama than they were under Donald Trump.
Bullshit! That article shows you’re wring.
93, 000, 000 people out of the workforce under Barack Obama says otherwise. The only reason people can get away with saying that Barack Obama was so great is because their jobs were not actively taken.
Again, read that article. It was worse in 2019 (pre-COVID) than under Obama. I don’t think Obama was great at all.
We agree on that.
You demonstrated that you don’t understand how rational arguments work when you insisted that the John Stossel videos were reasonable evidence for your point even after I showed you why his evidence is flimsy and anecdotal.
Because they are.
You just used the logical fallacy known as “begging the question.”
Whereas I have repeatedly shown evidence that his claims are either cherry-picked or outright false.
Does Google tell you that?
I’m sure you think Texas State University is also an “unreliable source.” https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Begging-the-Question.html
It depends on the slant of the staff.
No, it depends on the slant of the people who sign the paycheck, which is pretty much always right of center. Even TYT has proved itself right of center.
That is debatable.
Not as long as words have meanings.
Point taken.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-joe-biden-donald-trump-technology-49a24edd6d10888dbad61689c24b05a5
Joe Biden is a bumbling fool who can’t articulate coherent thought.
No disagreement here.
Finally.
Seriously, search my blog. Almost everything, if not everything, I have said about Biden has been negative, but that is also the case for Trump.
Trump is a criminal who shouldn’t even be allowed to vote, let alone be president. He has multiple credible rape accusations, fomenting an insurrection on January 6, and there’s the emoluments clause…
All bullshit meant to defame and smear him.
Wrong. You’re so steeped in lies, it’s not even funny.
No, it is not wrong.
I keep asking you to provide evidence. You keep refusing. That proves that you have no evidence.
Even if I provided it, you would decry it as propaganda.
As you keep doing with mine, but at least I made the effort. You’re just a lazy shit.
I don’t feel like the world owes me stuff.
Rational people believe that food, housing, and health care are human rights. It’s part of the United Nations charter.
Onthe matter of health care being a human right, that is debatable.
I found your house: https://i.redd.it/8063pisjucg41.jpg
More bullshit.
It certainly represents your attitude. Bootlick all the way! All Trump supporters are bootlickers.
Look at the idiots who stuck is with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Because Trump is one of the worst presidents of all time, and he committed treason in attempt to stay in power.
No, genius. That is Democrat media spin.
No it isn’t.
Yes, it is.
Prove it.
Google would probably censor that search.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Google has been shown to do so.
But the sites you consider reliable are extreme-right propaganda that typically lie.
No, genius. Your sources are the real liars.
Bullshit! Yours are funded by evil billionaires like the Koch brothers.
I take no monetary funding from anybody.
I doubt that.
I am not involved in government directly, so your statement is invalid.
I would doubt that. Lot of people get subsidies that they deny are welfare.
Not true.
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article248246980.html
The reason for the reported lack of proof is that no news outlets report it in a fair and unbiased manner.
Liar.
B.S. artist.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/11/05/here-are-the-debunked-voter-fraud-claims-trump-and-his-supporters-are-spreading/
This is basically a bunch of b.s. spun by never Trumpers.
https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/elections/2020/11/20/dozens-of-claims-about-election-fraud-debunked-politifact/
They are “debunked” by lying and dishonest media outlets.
Lying and dishonest media outlets are the ones you’ve already demonstrated you trust, e.g. Daily Wire.
The Daily Wire is a reliable news source.
No it isn’t. It’s a propaganda site.
What a load of rubbish!
Everything you’ve posted here is rubbish.
No, what you have posted is rubbish.
Says someone who demonstrably cannot tell the difference between extreme-right propaganda and facts.
You got it ass-backwards.
You are so brainwashed, it’s not even funny. You would be marching in lockstep with the Nazis.
I am a libertarian-leaning conservative capitalist.
Libertarians believe in the freedom of the rich to enslave the poor. All capitalism is is “he who has the gold (capital) makes the rules.” Capitalism is evil.
No, it is not.
I’ve read Milton Friedman. It’s precisely that.
Have you heard or read about his Negative Income Tax proposal?
Another band-aid for the failings of capitalism, but I wouldn’t oppose it.
Neither would I.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/business/fox-smartmatic-news-package/index.html
The voting systems were probably tampered with behind the scenes.
Prove it.
I will leave that to the experts and Trump legal team.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/presidential-election-2020-conspiracy-theories-debunked/
What you call conspiracy theories I call facts.
What you call facts, intelligent people call lies.
What you call lies, I call facts.
Because you’re either an idiot or a liar.
You meet both criteria yourself, you chuckle head.
Because in your deranged mind, providing evidence shows one to be an idiot and liar. That’s why you keep refusing to provide any.
If there was Russian collusion, it was to the democrats’ benefit, not Trump’s benefit.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
The Daughters of the Confederacy (traitors) would be very proud of you.
That is good.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/14/there-is-not-has-not-been-any-credible-evidence-significant-fraud-2020-election/
Since major media outlets and some social media giants seem to engage in censorship, your point would be invalid.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/01/12/fact-check-false-claim-fraud-arizona-voter-registrations/4114323001/
Left-leaning propaganda. What a surprise!
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/voter-fraud/617354/
Voter fraud is perpetuated by the democrats.
You’re a lying sack of shit. It’s always Republicans who are caught committing voter fraud. https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2021/02/16/murphys-law-10-republicans-accused-of-voter-fraud/
Bullshit! The democrats accuse republicans of the very behavior that they (the democrats) engage in themselves.
Voter fraud is always perpetrated by Republicans. https://www.azmirror.com/2021/07/13/voter-fraud-scottsdale-woman-indicted-for-casting-dead-mothers-ballot/
Bullshit!
Liar.
You are a liar.
Dinesh D’Souza even went to prison for it.
He went to prison for over donating money to a political campaign. What is truly laughable is that the money equals speech crowd want to limit campaign contributions by law.
No, the people who want to limit campaign contributions don’t believe that money equals speech. As Moynihan said, you’re entitled to your own opinions but are not entitled to your own facts.
Point taken.
Interesting that I was able to show you twelve cases of voter fraud committed by Republicans while you’ve shown zero committed by Democrats but insist that only Democrats commit voter fraud. When what you insist is contrary to the evidence, it proves that you are irrational.
Nonsense.
How is it nonsense that I showed you twelve cases of Republicans committing voter fraud? The links are right there in the thread.
It is just media hype from a bunch of idiots who want the republicans to look bad.
Apparently you don’t understand what it means to be charged and convicted if you dismiss it as media hype.
You still haven’t shown me ONE case of Democrats committing voter fraud.
Because Left-wng media won’t accurately report it.
Liar.
You live in la-la land.
My reality is supported by facts. Your reality is supported by unsupported claims.
Rubbish.
I’m the one supplying evidence. You are not. All third-party observers will agree with me. You need serious mental help.
No, you do if you believe the b.s. from the media and our politicians.
I wasn’t citing the media. I was citing a YouTube video that was citing specialists on Nazi Germany and passages from Mein Kampf that contradict Crowder’s claims that Hitler was a Marxist. Hitler specifically stated he was opposed to Marx’s ideas.
Adolf Hitler was a tyrant and a Jew hater.
And? Karl Marx was a (non-practicing) Jew, and Hitler considered socialism inherently Jewish. https://www.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%201994.pdf
I wonder why.
Hitler hated socialism, and he hated Jews, and Marx was a Jew.
He hid it to avoid a death sentence by Adolf Hitler.
Karl Marx lived from 1818 to 1883. Hitler wasn’t even born until 1889. and became chancellor in 1933. It’s hilarious how much someone with no knowledge of history pontificates,
My mistake.
Republicans are tyrants.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ReallyAmerican1/status/1433182694071021577
No, dude. Democrats are. KKK? Slavery? Indian oppression? What common theme do they share? All originated from the democrats.
False. And did you even click on the link?
https://faithandheritage.com/2014/07/refuting-a-republican-canard-the-kkk-is-democratic/
I did, yes, however, after reading it, I found it to be non-credible.
That’s an utterly irrational statement, but that’s typical of you.
As if you are the modern day Einstein.
Your intelligence doesn’t come anywhere close to mine.
Whatever you say.
You’ve demonstrated it with your foolishness regarding the election.
The election was rigged in favor of Joe Biden.
The primary was, not the general. The vast majority of the country hates Trump. The only reason he did as well as he did is because of gerrymandering.
Hillary Clinton was not popular enough to win the 2016 election, so your point is invalid.
Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, so my point most certainly is valid.
Until the Electoral College is abolished, which I hope never happens, every state should get represented, not just states with greater populations.
What we have with the electoral college is a tyranny of a minority. That needs to be eliminated. 30% of the country controls 60% of the Senate. That’s not right either. The electoral college was created for the sole purpose of preserving slavery. It should never have existed to begin with.
Neither the minority or the majority should get to sway things if it means screwing the other group of people over.
Well, people are constantly being screwed over as it stands. Hundreds of thousands of people are going to be made homeless over the latest SCOTUS decision.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, the subprime mortgage crisis did the same thing.
And that was the fault of right-wingers deregulating Wall Street.
Point stipulated.
I suspect this describes your education: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ9B4vkus64
Wrong.
Here’s another Republican who committed both voter fraud and murder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBdgqEuMEfw
Bullshit!
Trump is the king of liars, and you are his minion.
I listen and then make up my own mind on things.
No, you decide what you want to be true and ignore any evidence that doesn’t fit that conclusion.
All Left-leaning media with few exceptions is full of shit.
All mainstream media except for some YouTubers lean right.
Is that so?
Yes, it is, and if you looked up the definitions of left-wing and right-wing in any political science textbook, you would understand why that is true. And you would also understand that Biden’s positions are all far-right, e.g. crime bill, student debt, border policy, foreign policy, etc.
People who whine about student loan debt are just looking for handouts.
No, you’re talking about businesses that complain that people don’t want to work for the wage they’re paying–those are whiners. Most of the developed world pays for higher education through taxation.
What are some of their financial states? Flat broke.
They were broke before they were communist, or in the cases of Venezuela and Cuba, the wealth was concentrated among oligarchs.
What about Nazi Germany?
What about it? Nazi Germany was extreme right, so you should support it.
No, it was not.
You’re an idiot. https://www.csun.edu/~vcmth00m/NazismSocialism.html
Did you not read the history of the massacre of the Jewish population?
And? How does that have anything to do with where Nazis are on the political spectrum?
Socialism, National and otherwise, is a morally bankrupt ideology.
Nazis were not socialists. They sheepdogged the socialists into the part ands exterminated them during the Night of the Long Knives. Learn history. Start with the CSUN article to which I just linked you.
Three more Republicans caught committing voter fraud. No Democrats caught committing voter fraud.
https://crooksandliars.com/2021/12/three-florida-republicans-arrested?utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter&utm_content=54068
Do they self-identify as republicans?
They’re registered Republicans, which you’d know if you had bothered to read it.
If they said in their own words, that is one thing. How can I be sure that your sources are not liars?
Considering how many liars you believe because they say what you want to hear?
They are not liars, you fool.
I already showed you the video showing Steven Crowder lying through his teeth about Canadian health care and then try to generalize those lies to all socialized medicine. John Stossel couldn’t be honest about how much vacancy there is in san Francisco in order to demonize government that is answerable to the people in favor of private corporations answerable to no one.
No, dude, the people who accuse Steven Crowder of lying are the real liars.
So, to you, when Steven Crowder goes to a blood test clinic without an appointment and can’t get a doctor but omits that the clinic’s website states that they can get you a doctor if you request one in advance, you believe that he is being upfront and honest.
About his experience, yes.
If you can’t see this as being intentionally misleading about the clinic’s policies, you’re a fool.
Whatever you say.
Explain why you believe it was honest for Crowder to complain that he couldn’t see a doctor at the blood clinic while withholding the fact that the clinic has a procedure to see a doctor that he didn’t want to follow. If he has talked about how he didn’t like the procedure, that would have been honest, but he presented it as though you can’t see a doctor at that clinic, which is a lie. He also complained about Canadian clinics being closed on weekends, implying that U.S. clinics are normally open on weekends, which the debunking video showed is not typical either where Crowder lives or in Mesa, Arizona, the most Republican-leaning city. How is that honest?
Steven Crowder probably exaggerated on that to some degree. The problem is in the unfair reporting by the media when problems do arise.
ROTFLMAO! As though Crowder is fair!
Everyone is biased on things, period.
Your here: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/florida-man-gets-5-years-assault-capitol-riot-longest-sentence-n1286249?fbclid=IwAR0znqruL6RdWfuDT8-Vmp6DFhtwM0ktTv2Dame8N611YL3a3BYy6eURZrk
Bullshit. I was never there to participate in bullshit like that.
He’s a hero to everyone who thinks Trump won the election.
You deceive yourself.
Says a guy whop supports a treasonous coup… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaKPNSoydz4
The treasonous coup was initiated against Donald Trump.
You’re delusional He lost 60 court cases before federal judges he appointed because he couldn’t provide evidence. Anyone who pretends that Trump won the election should be locked up for treason.
Anybody who claims that George W. Bush alone was responsible for the shit show in Iraq who does not look at the fact that the U.S. Congress went along with it should accuse the government at large, excluding the Judicial branch, of war crimes.
I agree with that. When others were celebrating the life of Colin Powell when he passed away. I was denouncing him as a war criminal.
If any indictments and prosecutions should have been done, indict the Bush administration and the U.S. Congress equally.
Crowder is a scumbag who got suspended from YouTube for encouraging trans suicide. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpzFqhOYI_4
Crowder is the scum of the earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aai2LgMhs9A
I call b.s. on that.
Because you’re a fool.
As if you are an intellectual giant.
My intelligence tests have pretty consistently placed me one point short of genius.
When John Adams said, “Thomas Jefferson still survives,” in what circumstance was that said?
Intelligence is not whether you know certain obscure facts.
If you cannot intelligently answer that question, you are a fool.
That’s not what intelligence is. Intelligence is the ability to think and learn./ I could easily research the answer.
Whatever you say.
If you really believed that, you wouldn’t think Hitler was a socialist. https://www.quora.com/What-do-communists-think-of-Mein-Kampf/answer/Alexander-Finnegan
I know what the history books allegedly say on the matter. Do you get your information from Howard Zinn?
So you’re just going to ignore that Hitler was virulently anti-Marxist in Meoin Kampf?
If he said so in his own words, he might have been believable.
That link had quotations. Of course they were translated from German, but I doubt you can read German.
Google Translate can help.
There are no legitimate history books that say that the Nazis were socialist in anything but name.
They probably omitted some of the other details to make the Nazis look good.
ROTFLMAO! You really are brainwashed.
You probably read Karl Marx in college and now subscribe to his bullshit.
No bullshit about it. It was the most thorough and accurate critique of capitalism ever written.
He had the oh so brilliant idea for the income tax.
Just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it a bad idea.
The income tax, the redistribution of wealth and the welfare state is only designed to keep poor people dependent and in poverty.
No, it’s to alleviate the poverty caused by capitalism. The reason it doesn’t work is because it’s used for wars of choice, which was the reason Wilson enacted it. https://scottandrewhutchins.wordpress.com/2014/11/07/review-regulating-the-poor-the-functions-of-public-welfare-by-frances-fox-piven-and-richard-a-cloward/
Capitalism is not the cause of poverty. People who claim it is have been brainwashed by modern academia.
People who deny it have been brainwashed by capitalist media.
Outside of legitimate medical disabilities that make certain lines of work impractical, even impossible, people who stand on street corners holding signs advertising states of hardship and asking for handouts via panhandling are just looking for excuses to be lazy. The same is true for people who claim to be on welfare and use that as license to demand free stuff.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/23/michigan-republicans-no-evidence-voter-fraud-claims-trump
Probably anti-Trump republicans making these claims.
Trump lost, and anyone who disagrees is a mental case.
No, Joe Biden stole the election.
that is a lie you cannot back up with any evidence. That’s why you keep making the claim you keep failing to back up.
He had a lot of clueless supporters to help him and foreign interference that enabled him to get the Presidency.
That’s as much bullshit as when Rachel Madcow claimed that about Trump without any evidence.
No, it is not.
You never have any evidence. You right-wingers just act on what you want to believe. You don’t even have any principles. You think voter fraud is only bad if it helps Democrats, when all documented cases have helped Republicans. You claim that the second amendment gives the right to everyone to own a gun but were silent when Philando Castille was murdered by a cop for legal possession of a handgun. You claim to support states’ rights, but applauded Trump when he struck down California having stricter environmental legislation than other states. You’re all just a bunch of big liars who invoke principles you don’t actually when it fits with your extremist agenda.
We are not.
I just gave numerous examples of how you are, so that was a stupid response.
Whatever.
That’s always your response when presented with facts.
Your “facts” come from b.s. sources.
Says a guy who spreads lies fomented by the Koch Brothers.
What do you have that is more reliable? Vox?
Here’s why Breitbart is absolute rubbish: https://www.dw.com/en/who-are-the-mercers-the-wealthy-backers-of-breitbart/a-42100407
Are you going to tell me that the Drudge Report is also rubbish?
It’s basically an aggregator, so it’s hard to judge.
Exactly.
No one who isn’t rich would support Trump if they had any brain. I found a picture of you: https://i.redd.it/tckh0191gas51.jpg
You don’t even know what I actually look like.
He represents how dumb non-rich Trump supporters are.
Wrong.
In what way is it wrong? What has Trump done to help the non-rich? You probably still think he saved that Carrier plant in Indiana. The reality is that the jobs still went to Mexico.
Because of our tax code being unfriendly to business growth. We tax and regulate businesses to the point where the leave and then politicians complain about the lack of jobs?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/right-wing-site-american-thinker-retracts-completely-false-dominion-voting-systems-claims
The Dominion voting system claims are not false.
Liar.
You are the real liar.
Yes, the people with evidence on their side are the liars. You need to be locked in a padded cell in a mental institution.
Go find some adult diapers to lose your shit in!
Now you’re posting ad hominems. I’m still waiting for a shred of evidence for anything that you say. The fact that I provide evidence while you provide ad hominems proves to all rational people that I am correct.
You are wrong and you know it.
You might as well have said, “evidence, schmevidence!” You’re just like the Catholic church telling Galileo that the sun revolves around the Earth.
Bullshit!
Oh, what a great rebuttal…. It shows you have nothing.
Whatever.
Even Trump’s lawyers know it’s a pack of lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnVic7MBCOc
They probably know better than that, as would you if you had anything more than the common sense of a kitchen table.
Anyone who thinks Trump won the election is brain dead.
No, people who believe the lies about government giving us free shit is brain dead.
They are no more “free shit” than increased military budgets. The fact that you keep saying this is proof-positive that you are a liar.
If you want to be a brainwashed stooge, keep going to college.
Says the ultimate brainwashed stooge.
Thank you for the compliment.
Someone as uneducable as you would say that. You probably scored 70 on your IQ test and think that’s average.
Public “education” produces more brain dead unthinking stooges than private school or homeschool.
Says someone who keeps consistently demonstrating that he is completely incapable of rational thought. You probably say that because you flunked out of school.
I was home schooled and actually learned useful stuff, not being a reprogrammed automaton without the ability to think independently.
You don’t have the ability to think independently. The fact that you are a Trump/Info Wars drone proves it.
The only thing Infowars has spoken of that I don’t buy into is the 9/11 truther b.s. that is talked about.
That’s one of the few things they get right.
We agree on something.
How so?
Do you agree that 9/11 was not an inside job?
I think it was. People who were there when it happened describe it very differently from the official report.
I agree with you on that. What about the collapse of building 7?
No way planes could have done that alone based on how the buillding was engineered.
If no planes hit, how did 3 Towers collapse all at once?
When did I claim that no planes hit?
You did no such thing. was only asking how 3 buildings collapsed if only 2 towers were hit.
Controlled demolition is the only explanation that makes sense.
Try telling that to nonbelievers.
You were probably one of the treasonous fucks who wanted to hang Mike Pence on January 6.
He screwed Trump out of a well earned and deserved victory, so he should get a tarnished reputation.
You’re insane.
My sanity is perfectly intact.
No one who thinks Trump won the election is insane.
What about the insanity of people like Maxine Waters? She should be in a mental hospital.
No she doesn’t; however, Trump does.
You got it ass-backwards.
Wrong again! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lnsDmclw-E
I watch David Pakman from time to time. All of this anti-Trump b.s. is unsubstantiated.
False.
Your reality and mine seem to be different.
My reality is backed up with facts. Your “reality” is brainwashing bought and paid for by the Koch Brothers.
So be it.
Liar.
You are delusional.
Did you even watch the video? The voting machines weren’t even connected to the internet.
Look in the mirror.
So the media tells us.
Oh, so you’re saying they flawlessly dubbed over Republican election supervisors saying that?
Essentially.
And you call me delusional? You need mental help, seriously.
You have everything ass-backwards.
The stuff you believe is not even remotely plausible. You are clearly incapable of rational thought. You are in severe need of mental help.
No, dude. The people who buy into the false promises of free stuff are those who need help.
No one is promising free stuff.
Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, et cetera, are.
We’ve been through this. That’s a right-wing smear.
It is the truth.
Only if you think war is free stuff.
Free stuff for politicians.
War is pure, unadulterated theft from the American people. Health care paid through taxation is reinvesting in the American people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn5JRKWgnps
No argument is being made against any of that.
Calling it “free stuff” sure as hell makes you sound like an opponent.
If goods and/or services are provided free of charge on a voluntary basis, I have no problem with it being classified as free stuff on that basis. Other than that, people who want free stuff on-demand on the basis that they cannot afford that which they want are just being lazy.
First of all, things paid for with public funds are not “Free stuff” and the only people who call it that are people who oppose public money being used for that person.
Only a twisted, evil pervert thinks not being able to afford necessities is caused by laziness. As I previously mentioned, minimum wage at full time can’t get a 1-bedroom apartment in 93% of the country. No intelligent person thinks people in low-wage jobs are lazy. As previously mentioned, the job market is absolute crap, and that isn’t the fault of anyone except greedy capitalists.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, people who use college as license to party are part of the problem. They also elect to pursue stupid shit like arts degrees instead of things conducive to employment after they graduate.
That is an asinine thing to say.
No, it’s a fact. Outside of an economic depression, which I will concede makes finding a job difficult, people who go to college and can’t find good jobs after they graduate probably pursued useless stuff while in college.
The association of liberal arts with uselessness or with partying are both false.
Reread he part about people using college as license to party.
Repeating it doesn’t make it true. You don’t know shit, and considering how much time you spend on my blog, I doubt you’re employed.
Because of a medically complex situation, traditional lines of work are impractical.
Then what right have you to harass other disabled people for not working?
If some people have a love of animals, they can volunteer at a pet shelter, to name one example.
Irrelevant.
No, dude. If some people have disabilities that make certain lines of work inadvisable, there are other options out there.
Volunteering and employment are two different things. I became homeless because Social Security says that I can do a desk job, and therefore, cannot receive Disability. The capitalist class has decided otherwise.
All the more reason to fix the disability system in my opinion.
Arts degrees are neither stupid nor useless, nor are those who pursue them more likely to be partiers than others.
If arts degrees don’t produce job opportunities, that would render your point as invalid.
Plenty of people with arts degrees have jobs; the fact that the fields are competitive and that nepotism plays a huge role in who gets hired does not make this untrue.
Point conceded.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/stem-education-is-vital-but-not-at-the-expense-of-the-humanities/
I have read similar things. My opinion remains unchanged.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/3529650577052826/posts/6490701397614381
I am on Gab and Gettr. Facebook’s censorship is absurd.
The point was for you to read that particular post and the comments.
I don’t know if I can read them without being on Facebook. To be honest, I have no interest in being on a social media platform the arbitrarily censors opposing viewpoints.
It censors me all the time, so it’s not leftist. It’s corporate economically conservative/socially liberal.
I have heard that Facebook has been censoring conservatives. Are my sources lying?
Facebook is center-right. They are censoring the left and the extreme-right.
So the talking heads claim. I am no fan of his, however, if Mark Zuckerberg said that Facebook would only censor people for deliberately violating Facebook’s terms and conditions for use, not based solely on ideological differences, I could take that seriously.
He’s a liar. In fact, I got a 30-day suspension just for calling someone a liar.
If the truth is on your side, good for you.
Here’s Harvard:
https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/research-note-examining-false-beliefs-about-voter-fraud-in-the-wake-of-the-2020-presidential-election/
Propaganda.
Wrong.
No, it is not wrong.
Your continued failure to present evidence shows otherwise, just as Trump losing all his court cases shows otherwise.
Donald Trump needs a better legal team. Mark Levin should have been on it.
The nest legal team in the world can’t make an argument without any evidence.
That does not change the fact that he could have selected a better legal team.
https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/10/at-georgia-house-hearing-republicans-baseless-claims-of-voting-fraud-persist
They are not baseless. It is the false narratives of the anti-Trump media that are baseless. Don’t drink the Kool-Aid.
You’ve got that ass-backwards, imbecile.
Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
Evidence is not “Kool-Aid.”
Your “evidence” stems from non-credible sources.
Says someone who thinks Info Wars is a credible source.
More often then not it is.
Wrong.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/12/18/roger-stone-admits-infowars-lies-settles-lawsuit/gp2MK7FUomfbjrXPlNXF6H/story.html
That is probably propaganda.
Find me a Democrat who has said anything as mentally unstable as the Republicans in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kVC5tB3Toc
Maxine Waters? Madonna?
I’ve never heard either say anything as stupid as the Republicans in that video.
That means you are drinking the Kool-Aid.
Anyone who pays attention to Tomi Lahren is drinking the Kool-Aid.
Rubbish.
Only a brainwashed fool would take Tomi Lahren seriously.
I never claimed that I did.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/11/01/1011519/election-voter-fraud-claims-bad-science-polling/
You’ve made it abundantly clear why you insist Stossel is not a liar. Anyone that says what you want to believe has to e telling the truth in your eyes. You need serious mental help. And you’re being told that by someone who was homeless for eight years and three months and whose rent is paid by city money.
You need a mental health check.
I already said that about you, dimwit. Remember, I’ve had seven clean mental health checks while I was homeless and only got a positive when bias was intentionally introduced.
I was returning insult for insult.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2021/06/17/opinion-gop-voter-fraud-conspiracy-theories-read-like-science-fiction/7697311002/Remember, I’ve had seven clean mental health checks while I was homeless and only got a positive when bias was intentionally introduced.
I was referring to your needing one if you believe the bullshit spewed by Left-leaning media types.
If you believe the bullshit spread by the right-wing media, you’re a fool.
And you are an intellectual giant?
I got in the 98th percentile on my cognitive skills tests in high school.
Congratulations.
https://www.statesman.com/story/news/2021/06/17/opinion-gop-voter-fraud-conspiracy-theories-read-like-science-fiction/7697311002/
GOP voter fraud reports are accurate.
“Duhhhh…. I is smarter then NE wun at MIT or Harvard.”–ragnarsbhut
Going against my clearly superior intellect won’t help your case.
ROTFLMAO!!!!
You are drinking too much Kool-Aid.
Look in the mirror.
You do the same.
I look in the mirror and see an honest, educated person who doesn’t fall for the lies of right-wing extremists. I look at you and see the opposite.
Left-leaning types are tools.
Why, for not voting against our own best interests?
No, because they hear “free” stuff and automatically jump on the bandwagon of politicians who promise it.
Except no one on the left has said anything about anything being free. That is how the right has smeared (lied about) what the left has said.
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders talk about free college.
No they don’t. Not in those terms.
Sure they do.
No they don’t. They occasionally say “free at point of service.”
The money has to come from somewhere. Why not from those who benefit?
Are you even reading what I write before you make such asinine comments? Classic strawman tactics.
Yes, I am.
By claiming that only the individual benefits from education, you are clearly not understanding me, or trying to get me to agree to something I never claimed.
I am not benefiting from someone getting a college degree, so why should I contribute to it?
Not true. But since you’re going to use that logic, then people who aren’t benefitting from their college degrees should have their debt annulled, right? You said it should be paid for only by those who benefit.
Exactly. You want to go to college? You pay for it.
But you just said that those who don’t benefit form college shouldn’t have to pay for it. I earned two degrees but remain in poverty; therefore, by your logic, I should not have to pay for it.
Because you did not benefit from it, nor should other people pay for it.
So we agree that my student loan debt should be annulled?
If you did not benefit from a college education, your tuition should be refunded.
We agree on something. Some people have said that the refund should also mean a revoking of my degree. I can’t agree with that. I did the work necessary to get the degree.
Due to a complex medical situation, something I was born with, it keeps me from being able to pursue college. Even if it did not, nobody would owe me that opportunity.
That’s a foolish idea. Higher education is a public good that should be paid for by the public.
If some people choose not to go to college, why should they pay for other people to go if there is no biological relationship between the people in question.
Again, because it is a public good that benefits society as a whole.
I fail to see how I benefit from someone getting a degree in theater or art.
Just because you don’t appreciate arts education doesn’t mean most people don’t.
True, however, people who want to go to college should work toward that goal, not demand handouts.
Do you realize how much more one would have to work for such a degree now than in the past? https://www.instagram.com/p/CRFlQfEtfJc/
Either work for it or ask for handouts. One results in great satisfaction, the other is just degrading and embarrassing.
You’re an idiot.
Shut up!
This is my blog. You should leave.
Whatever you say.
Since you were probably too lazy to click the link, here it is: Bernie Sanders : “The Boomer generation needed just 306 hours of minimum wage work to pay for four years of public college. Millennials need 4,459. The economy today is rigged against working people and young people. That is what we are going to change.”
If you think someone should have to work 4,459 hours just to get the funding for an arts degree rather than have it paid for as the public good that it is, you are a depraved fool.
At least I don’t feel like I am entitled to free shit.
I think the government should be using tax money responsibly for the benefits of citizens, not for war profiteering.
I would agree with you on that. The only way that could be achieved is if the libertarian Party had control in our government.
ROTFLMAO! The Libertarian Party is all about freedom for those with capital and screwing over everyone else. They’re opposed to all public spending and want to end public schools.
Because government spending has gotten out of control. What is so bad about eliminating public schools? Nothing in our Founding Documents says anything about our having a right to a taxpayer-funded education at any level.
The founding fathers also claimed the right to own people. Only a true thief would deny education to a child because their parents’ can’t pay for it. Like I said before, you have zero right to complain if a store short-changes you because you didn’t want to contribute to the education of the staff.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, modern academia is an abomination. People are indoctrinated into the belief that they are victims without even contemplating how they can alter their own life paths to avoid being victims.
How the fuck would you know? You already admitted you weren’t even competent enough to stay in school. Have you ever considered that whoever told you that was indoctrinating you with lies? Because that’s what they were doing.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, due to medical/health issues, college is not in my foreseeable future. Competence has nothing to do with it. I prefer to read stuff online or get into The Great Courses. More educational and less costs long-term than college tuition.
Reading and watching videos is not the same as classroom education.
My medical issues limit me to desk work, and because of the income cliff the city set up with the housing voucher program, I’ve had to pretty much give up looking for work because making local minimum wage ($15 an hour at full time) makes one too wealthy to remain in the housing voucher program, but too poor to afford any housing here without help.
Given the general lack of response to my job applications over the past twenty years, I have no confidence in the capitalist class to respond to them at any greater rate than they did previously, which was under 1%, particularly with the way I’ve been informed that the ATS most large companies use mangle my resume in a way no one has ever been able to help me thwart.
I literally had someone tell me I’d have an easier time finding work if I went back to school for a bachelor’s degree in communication studies, but since I earned one of those in 1999, I find that claim incredibly laughable. She didn’t realize I had because Facebook allows you to put only one major, and I had a double major, which took an extra year to complete. I put English because of the two majors, it’s generally considered the more difficult.
Are you saying that Socialism is better?
Absolutely I am. Capitalism helps the capitalists, generally at the expense pf everyone else. Why should children of the poor be denied an education so that they can stay poor in a society where most living-wage jobs require credentials, not to mention the overall benefits of being educated and living in an educated society? Capitalism basically says, “I’m better than you because I have capital.” It’s a very evil philosophy.
Look at Steven Crowder’s segments on Socialism on Youtube.com and he will tell the truth about it being a morally bankrupt ideology.
I can show you lots pf videos showing you how morally bankrupt capitalism is. Every video I’ve seen claiming that socialism was morally bankrupt either outright lied or claimed that all bad things done by nominally “socialist” countries were inherent to socialism, whereas bad things done by capitalist countries are never inherent to capitalism.
I will not argue the fact that Capitalist systems are not immune from a certain set of problems. What are your thoughts on Social Democracies around the world?
I think they are a major improvement on what the U.S. has; however, they still privilege the ownership class over the working class.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, I will not argue that point. Having said that, I will argue that the only way perfect equality can be achieved is if everyone was equally poor.
And that is a total bullshit argument. If all wealth were divided equally, everyone would have $32,000, which would help more than 3/4 of the people on the planet.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, outside of hard economic times due to no making of one’s own, poverty is self-inflicted otherwise.
That is completely false.
Tell that to people who sit on street corners with cigarettes in one hand and holding signs advertising a need of help. They don’t want or need help. All they are looking for is a way to satisfy their addictions.
Bullshit. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about and need to shut up. You don’t even know any homeless people, so you just came up with a hypothetical far-right stereotype.
You should re-watch those Stossel videos.
The ones where he lies through his teeth with a non-representative sample?
He has illustrated the fact that there are both con/scam artists and that there are some who truly need help. In the Freeloaders: Panhandling video, only one guy who was offered a job to do lawn work actually showed up.
And I showed you info that scientifically demonstrated that scammers are extremely rare. Stossel uses a dishonest strategy called “undue weight.” He also claimed that San Francisco doesn’t have enough vacant property to house the homeless, also a demonstrable lie.
Some of these people don’t want housing.
Not true. What they don’t want is the abuse shelter providers often inflict.
I have not seen any of this abuse, so how do I know that it is not propaganda?
I’ve experienced and witnessed it, and I write about it extensively on this blog. You know it’s not propaganda because the mainstream media doesn’t discuss it.
I don’t doubt that.
More proof Stossel is an outright liar:
The people who put in the time to create signs advertising states of hardship in order to con other people out of their money should have as much time to try to find work.
The portion of people who do that is so infinitesimal that it’s not worth worrying yourself. That’s been proven in a scientific study to which I already linked you.
You are using the logical fallacy known as “cherry picking.”
You clearly missed the point. If there are people who are on the streets holding signs advertising states of hardship that were handmade, they probably have the time to try to find work. People who are on the streets who appear to be genuinely desperate and starving are a separate matter.
Based on my experiences and the people I knew in the shelter system, they’re doing what they’re doing because their efforts have finding jobs have not gotten them anywhere. And don’t go talking about the pandemic, either. Stossel first ran this story when I was still a teenager (1990s). Even under a lot of makeup, he doesn’t look as young as he does in this video, made when he was in his thirties.
While John Stossel is right about many things in my opinion, I will be willing to look into areas where he is demonstrably wrong.
I just sent you a video debunking his “5 socialism myths video” which shows how he lies, makes contradictory statements to fit his agenda, and thinks juxtaposing photographs proves broad-sweeping ideological points. It’s really pathetic. For example, he defines socialism as government nationalizing business, claims that video of Maduro with a megaphone declaring that a certain business is being seized by the government proves that Venezuela is a socialist country, but denies that Scandinavian countries are socialist even though they have far greater nationalization of industry than Venezuela does. So when he says “socialism,” it just means whatever he wants to demonize because he can’t keep a consistent definition from moment to moment.
I will look into it.
Crowder is a liar. Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUFvG4RpwJI
Hitler was a National Socialist (Nazi,) not a Social Democrat, as some people label themselves.
Did you watch the entire video? Crowder lies repeatedly, and every one of those lies gets broken down.
I did, however, it is disingenuous to call Steven Crowder a liar due to how he described the system that he was exposed to.
If you watch that video, you would see that he is a liar. He puts his agenda before the truth constantly.
He has told the truth from his experience that the Canadian health care system sucks. He has told the truth about the morally corrupt and ass-backwards ideology of Socialism.
No, those are all lies.
Hogwash.
You’re so brainwashed that you can’t tell lies from the truth. Even when Crowder is shown blatantly contradicting his sources, you insist that he’s not lying.
Nothing I have heard from him so far seems to be dishonest.
That video goes pint by point by point on all the things he says that are dishonest. You’re either a liar or a fool.
His alleged dishonesty is based on media distorting his reporting.
That’s not even an accurate description of the video, so either you didn’t watch it, didn’t understand it, or are lying.
Sure it is.
You’re a lying sack of shit. You think it’s honest to take a Gregor Strasse quote and attribute it to Hitler when Hitler had Strasse murdered? That’s just the first example of something Crowder lied about.
People who grow up under Socialism have more credibility in describing its evils than those who do not but want it to be implemented.
Not when what they were under was nothing like what Marx described. People who grew up under capitalism also have greater credibility in describing its evils.
Points stipulated, however what is the solution: Cede all authority to the government or abolish the government?
Neither.
If you have any solutions, I would not object to seeing them.
Watch the video that began this whole thread again.
I will do so.
You do realize that Marx wanted the government to wither away to just a few basic functions. I’m not sure why you right-wingers insist that Marx was for big government. It’s so easily disproven.
He had the idea of a graduated (progressive) income tax in The Communist Manifesto.
And? That doesn’t conflict with the withering of the state, especially when it’s a band-aid reform to get there.
Are you defending the idea of a graduated (progressive) income tax?
Absolutely.
The purpose of the income tax and the welfare state is to buy votes and redistribute wealth.
False.
You got it ass-backwards.
Liar.
Fool.
Imbecile.
Chuckle head.
I’m opposed to regressive taxers like sales taxes, which are a far greater burden on the poor than on the rich.
If everyone spends money at one point or another, with the rich having greater disposable assets and having more spending money, how is a sales tax regressive if theycan afford the greater expenditures?
Because they have fewer necessities they need to buy. $100 is a lot of money to a poor person. It’s not a lot of money to a rich person. The tax is much more painful to the poor. I do, on the other hand, support luxury taxes.
I would not mind a tax on financial transactions, such as the sale of stock.
I definitely support that one, too.
The way that tax is described makes some sense to me.
At no point in the video is there any example of the media distorting Crowder’s reporting. That’s how I know you’re either a liar, a mental case, or both.
If you are willing to hear Steven Crowder in his own words and then look at people who try to debunk him, I will give you credit for that.
If you watched that video, you would know that it showed Steven Crowder speak in his own words. Clearly you are lying about having watched the video or you have no brain.
All of the Steven Crowder videos I have seen indicate otherwise. Watch his Youtube videos on his channel in as much detail as possible and then tell me he is full of it.
Why would I do that after watching a video that was literally letting Steven Crowder talk, then putting it on pause and showing how he lied. In that case he was demonstrating that Crowder was lying about Hitler being a socialist/leftist. So Crowder would say Hitler believed one thing, and the narrator would cite a passage in Mein Kampf in which Hitler said exactly the opposite. Then he would play video of Crowder saying what the Nazis did that was supposedly socialist, then showing passage in history books saying that the Nazis did just the opposite. If you had watched the video, you would have seen clearly that Crowder is a liar in the extreme.
All of the videos I have seen indicate otherwise. Heck, he even debunked the oh-so wonderful Canadian health care system.
Probably with similar lies he used to claim that Hitler was a socialist.
I will watch more of him and see what his alleged lies are.
Watch the video I posted debunking his claims that Hitler was a socialist.
Adolf Hitler was a National Socialist (Nazi) Look it up onWikipedia.org if you are doubtful of that.
Nazis were not socialist even though they used it in the name. This is explained in great detail in the video I posted. If you also look on Wikipedia, it says that they are an extreme-right movement, murdered socialists during the Night of the Long Knives, and were not, in practice, socialists.
What about Stalin? Mussolini?
They were both far-right. Mussolini was involved in socialism briefly, but took a right turn. Stalin was not a socialist in any more than than name. https://web.archive.org/web/20180507120209/https://socialistworker.org/2018/05/07/the-fraud-of-stalinism
They were mass murderers.
And you think mass murder is inherently left-wing? You realize that the United States commits mass murder? The number of people Stalin killed has been grossly exaggerated, largely based on Nazi propaganda, and is lower than far-right Pinochet.
Scott Andrew Hutchins, Left-leaning types seem to either have a pro-abortion or pro-choice mentality regarding the lives of the unborn. However, ax murderers are those that they believe are undeserving of the death penalty.
Masses of cells are not human beings. That said, I don’t support late-term abortion. It is impossible for an ethical person to support the death penalty. Once the threat has been neutralized, there is no justification for it. Worse still, studies, including one by the National Academy of Sciences, have shown that four out of every hundred people executed have been later proven innocent. That fact alone should be enough to make any ethical person want there to be a moratorium on the death penalty when even initiatives like The Innocence Project fail to save innocent people in four out of every hundred institutions. No amount of reform has been able to reduce this number; therefore, if you support the death penalty, you think that it’s OK to kill innocent people to keep it going in spite of the threat being neutralized. Anyone who finds that acceptable is extremely evil.
Can you justify the double-standard in how the pro-abortion crowd is also seemingly anti-death penalty?
I just explained why it’s not a double standard.
Sure it is. Life is ended either way.
A clump of cells with some electrical impulses is not a person, so it’s not the same.
Are you saying that as it evolves and becomes a person that the person’s life is without value?
That seems to be what you’re saying, actually. Right-wingers tend not to give a shit about anybody once they’re born because the reality is that they want to control women, just like Hitler executed women for getting abortions.
Democrats don’t exactly have much of a pro-life record.
Republicans’ record is genocidal of their own people and people around the world. They can in no way be considered “pro-life.”
Bullshit.
It is absolutely true. Red states are most dependent on government programs that Republicans consistently want to cut so that the poor die off: https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700
These policies make the United States have the 33rd best health care of the 36 OECD countries: https://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2019-annual-report/international-comparison
Republicans support genocide in Yemen: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/15/america-stop-participating-yemen-war
Both parties support genocide in Palestine and other countries. It’s Republicans and self-described “conservative Democrats” like Biden always beating the drums for war.
Blue states are siphoning off the wealth of red states.
That’s a demonstrable lie.
No, it is not.
Yes it is.
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700
https://www.moneygeek.com/living/states-most-reliant-federal-government/
https://www.governing.com/finance/are-republican-states-more-federally-dependent.html
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/states-that-voted-for-trump-depend-the-most-on-big-government-2019-06-19
If Blue states stopped siphoning money off of Red states, this would be a nonissue.
But they aren’t, so it’s a stupid comment,
Yes, they are. The Left-wing media just claims otherwise to deceive peoplelikeyou.
No, that’s what the Koch-funded media does to you.
I have my own mind about things.
No you don’t. You believe disproven things just because you want to believe them, putting your feelings before facts.
Bullshit!
You consider it honest and trustworthy to take a quote out of a pamphlet written by someone murdered by Hitler and attribute it to Hitler to fit your agenda.
I never said such things.
You did when you said Steven Crowder was honest and trustworthy, and when you claimed to have watched the video I posted debunking Crowder’s claim that Hitler was a socialist. The very first point in the video was showing that Crowder did this.
You delude and deceive yourself.
In what way?
That all capitalist ideals are a cause for poverty.
That’s a verifiable fact.
Did Henry Ford cause poverty by creating Ford Motor Company?
An oversimplification to straw man again.
That does not answer my question.
Because it’s not a relevant question. It’s about as relevant as saying that snow disproves global warming.
Are you sure that it is an irrelevant question?
At first it seemed like you were making a “snowballs disprove global warming”-type argument.
if all of the global warming rhetoric is true, why are there no unfrozen parts in the Arctic and Antarctic regions of the Earth?
Before you said you weren’t a climate change denialist. You lied about that, too.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/antarcticas-ice-shelves-have-lost-millions-of-metric-tons-of-ice/
https://www.hakaimagazine.com/news/the-alarming-power-of-melting-arctic-ice/
So the premise of your question is a lie.
No, I did not.
“I do think that climate issues should be of concern.” was your exact quote.
If Al Gore is so concerned about climate change or other issues, he should stop using vehicles that produce emissions that are pollutants. Otherwise, he is a hypocrite.
So you’re arguing that he should be a hermit.
At least that would allow him to not spew propaganda on live TV.
You love people spewing propaganda.
https://www.democracynow.org/2021/7/30/headlines/greenland_lost_enough_ice_in_one_day_to_cover_florida_in_two_inches_of_water
What about the Florida hurricanes?
What about them? Climate change increases quantity of hurricanes.
Hurricanes are a natural, albeit an occasionally destructive thing, at times.
But there have been record numbers in recent years.
I did not deny that.
Yes. He could have paid his workers quadruple what he did and still turn a profit. Instead, he chose to spend the money on a personal gestapo because he was a fascist who wanted total control over his workers’ lives.
https://www.union-communiste.org/en/2014-03/usa-ford-peoples-tycoon-and-vicious-exploiter-3755
https://jalopnik.com/when-henry-fords-benevolent-secret-police-ruled-his-wo-1549625731
I didn’t know this before, so thanks for encouraging me to do the research.
Glad to do it.
That’s funny, considering my findings aren’t what you wanted.
Your findings are invalid.
I think you’re a refugee from Bizarro World.
Whatever.
You just said that deliberately misattributing quotations is speaking the truth.
If Al Gore speaks of climate change, he is full of it.
In what way?
He preaches about environmental issues, however, he always does the opposite of his expressed beliefs.
Liar.
Look up the information.
That’s not how debating works. You’re supposed to provide your own evidence, not tell people to look it up.
You want to know why people are homeless? Due to their own choices.
Bullshit. I didn’t become homeless due to my own choices, and no one else I know who is homeless did, either.
Nobody has to be homeless. Some people, not all, just thrive on it.
That’s a lie. No one thrives on it. If they’re homeless, they don’t have a choice.
Or they are fakers whose only goal is to con people out of their money.
They are not. You just refuse to admit that the system sucks.
You don’t know that.
Yes I do.
No, you don’t.
If my homelessness is my fault, then any parent who asks their kid to call them if their going to be late is at fault if the kid doesn’t call and shows up late.
True.
Braindead.
Chuckle head.
Says a guy who denies that begging the question is logically fallacious… https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Begging-the-Question
I have heard of logical fallacies.
But you don’t understand the concept because you keep using circular reasoning (of which begging the question is a form), which is one of the most basic of the fallacies.
Why is circular reason a bad thing?
You’re gay because you have sex with men.
I am not gay and have never done such a thing.
This was a demonstration of circular reasoning. This is the sort of argument you’ve been making continuously.
How is Bill Gates responsible for other people being in poverty? Not that I am a fan of his, however, what about George Soros?
Yes, first of all, he’s a thief who stole the software that made his fortune, then he made his riches underpaying people who did real work.
If he had the idea for Microsoft, how did he steal that which was his idea by definition?
He didn’t. He stole software developed by Gary Kildall and passed it off as his own.
I seriously doubt that.
It’s well documented. That’s why I could identify the exact person from whom he stole it.
Well documented? I call b.s. on that.
Translation: “I don’t want to do the research; therefore, it’s false. I don’t care how many hits a Google search gets.”
Google search engine is biased politically.
Then use a different search engine. It’s widely known that MS-DOS is a slight tweak of a program created by Gary Kildall.
Duck Duck Go also has some biases that would do the same thing.
There are more than two search engines.
Bing and Startpage are 2 more.
Nothing came through on this comment.
https://nyupress.org/9781479825172/not-gay/
If Capitalism increases poverty, which it does not, can you logically explain the issue of third world countries having greater poverty than we do?
I see you didn’t watch the video. third world countries aren’t poor. they have been plundered by capitalists. That poverty they experience is a direct result of capitalism.
If I judge a video to be worth my time, I will watch it.
You base that on how it conforms to what you want to believe.
Not true. I just want to be sure that the source is honest.
Look at what companies like DeBeers and Nestle do in the third world, and you’ll see capitalism at the root of all poverty. Then there are the capitalists like Coca-Cola that outright murdered people in Colombia for unionizing.
I seriously doubt that.
Because you’re a fool. This is common knowledge.
And you are an intellectual saint?
Reality: https://www.instagram.com/p/CRvxUW6pAZs/
I am not on Instagram.
And in this country look how the houses are being bought up for far more than they’re worth to corner the market and increase the homeless population for a profit.
If people stopped taking on 30/yr or more mortgages, they would probably have more in savings.
Capitalists create the rules, not individuals.
Still, if people looked at the long-term financial commitments of mortgages, they will look for the least costly option or be all cash buyers.
Which the vast majority of people can’t do. Cash buyers are creating homelessness through raising housing costs.
And those who take out a loan from a lending institution are not doing the same thing?
I am not on Facebook.
True, but to stop climate change, we need to stop billionaires from existing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE
One has no relevance to the other.
Total bullshit. Billionaires cause the majority of the climate change, as shown vividly in that film.
That is highly debatable.
It’s not, though. Facts are facts.
Just because some people want to call certain things facts does not make them facts. Example: If a highly caffeinated beverage is consumed late at night, it is a fact that said person who consumed it may endure a night of sleeplessness. It is an opinion if someone says he or she prefers a caffeinated beverage like Coca-Cola to coffee.
That wealthy people contribute the most to global warming is fact, not opinion.
Al Gore is a culprit in this regard.
The documentary I posted is actually quite damning of him, and it’s made by a leftist environmentalist with Michael Moore as executive producer.
Michael Moore slandered people who served in Iraq.
Bullshit!
John Kerry also did that to Vietnam War veterans who were of POW status.
Bullshit!
You are an idiot!
You supplied no evidence.
Listen to the testimony that John Kerry provided related to the Vietnam War hearings.
https://scottandrewhutchins.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/book-review-the-spitting-image-myth-memory-and-the-legacy-of-vietnam/
That book is probably full of revisionist history.
No, it investigates a lot of allegations and finds them to be baseless.
I am dubious.
I am dubious that any Vietnam veterans were spat upon.
Because you were not there in all likelihood.
I wasn’t born yet.
Which makes my point.
I know people who were shot in Vietnam who say that it did happen.
If they say it did, it did.
What did he lie about?
The alleged crimes that u.s. soldiers committed against the Vietnamese.
Those aren’t lies. A lot of that is verified.
By people who live in la la land filled with delusions and grandeur.
Bullshit! You just don’t want to admit that the people Nixon pardoned were pervy rapists and murderers.
I doubt that he actually did that.
Yeah, he did.
Prove it.
https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2019/12/nixons-leniency-after-my-lai-hurt-veterans-trumps-will-too/161905/
Interesting link.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/11/rich-people-wealthy-household-emissions-fossil-fuels-climate-change
So Bill Gate’ multi-billion dollar company Microsoft is causing climate change?
Yes, Watch that documentary. Microsoft’s claims to have switched to green energy is meaningless because they’re using more fossil fuels to create that energy than they would if they just used the fossil fuels.
I meant to say Bill Gates. There was an accidental typo.
Somalia is ultra-capitalist-libertarian, and it’s one of the poorest countries on Earth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMrAnh21a2A
There are poor states and counties in the USA, as well. Why? Because Blue states siphon off the wealth of red states.
All evidence is to the contrary. It’s red states like Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Kentucky that are some of the most egregious offenders in that area.
You dot it completely backwards.
I’ve shown you multiple sources of evidence that I’m right. You have shown no evidence.
I meant to say you got it completely backwards.
SO all these sites they say Louisiana gets more money from the federal government than any other state are all lying? Again, why haven’t thy lost libel cases?
I think so.
Because you’re an imbecile with no criteria for judging truth other than it fitting with your personal agenda.
Bullshit!
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence
Good info, but largely b.s. if you refuse to acknowledge the specified double-standard.
Again, there is no double standard. It is fundamentally dishonest to compare a clump of cells with electrical impulses to a human being. You might as well criminalize menstruation and ejaculation outside of a vagina.
That is a biological thing though.
So is what you’re talking about.
Your point being?
That you don’t have a point.
Whatever.
I bet you’re a huge fan of this guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3ZaDFLNxIg
Conservative media has a more reliable track record in terms of honest reporting.
I would expect a liar like you to make such a false claim.
You sound like an indoctrinated automaton with no abilty to think rationally.
Says a guy who parrots everything he hears on extreme-right sites as if they were true.
Because they are.
No rational person believes that.
Think whatever you want.
You haven’t demonstrated any rationality.
Whatever.
That’s always your response when you get caught lying.
The bigger liar is you.
I haven’t lied about anything, whereas you falsely described the content of a video you claimed to have watched.
I have heard that drivel from other sources, so why waste my time?
So, according to you, showing a screenshot of Crowder’s website that has him falsely attributing a quote by Gregor Strasse to Hitler is “drivel?”
Yes, because I have heard Steven Crowder in his own words many times.
Meaningless. Again, that video is Steve Crowder in his own words, with the narrator pausing to insert the truth every time Crowder lies. Here is a tweet showing Crowder making that same lie: https://twitter.com/classiclib3ral/status/929933366736060417
I have watched Steven Crowder’s videos many times. Not all of them, however, a good share of them.
How does that prove what he says is true?
He seems to do more research than mainstream media about this stuff and has been exposed to Socialist ideas in Canada.
That video shows that he lies like a mofo.
Only according to ill-informed people.
I am a very informed person, whereas you believe a proven liar who falsely attributes quotes to Hitler that were made by people Hitler had killed.
Because they spoke the truth.
You think deliberately misattributing quotations is speaking the truth. You need to be committed to a mental institution.
You need to look at the people who are clearly able to work but refuse to because welfare is more lucrative.
People say I’m clearly able to work despite documented medical conditions. It’s a garbage argument.
Self-employment is an avenue.
Self-employment requires obtaining clients similarly to obtaining an employer. As a freelance writer, I know that extremely well.
Point stipulated.
When someone spouts untrue things about what Nazi Germany did or did not do, it shows that they either didn’t research or that they’re lying.
Or Nazi Germany was rewriting history to make itself look good.
You’re seriously claiming that Mein Kampf has been revised after Hitler’s death and that Uwe Oster, Germa Bel, Hugh Trevor-Roper, Ian Kershaw, Theodore Roper, et al. are all secret Nazis, and that the actual Nazi pamphlets Three Arrows shows that show that their ideals are all right-wing are all forged? That’s an extraordinary claim and requires extraordinary evidence. Crowder provides absolutely none, and neither have you.
You have been thoroughly indoctrinated into the belief in a bunch of claptrap.
Says a guy who believes Steven Crowder, who spews all sorts of claims totally unsupported by any evidence.
The only people who refuse to believe him are those who have drank the Kool-Aid.
Only to fools whop think that contradicting historians without a shred of evidence is credible.
Whatever you say.
So if a whole panel of historians with Ph.D.s said Crowder was wrong, and provided a ton of evidence that he is wrong, you’d believe Crowder.
Because the sources are propaganda.
Get mental help please. Steven Crowder is obviously your god. He pulls shit out of his ass, and you believe it.
If he pulls shit out of his ass, he probably does it in his bathroom.
Everything Crowder says is completely made up and not backed by any evidence.
Watch his videos on the Canadian health care system and Medicare For All.
Why would I want to watch that when I know he’s a liar based on his claims that Hitler was a leftist?
Socialism, Leftism, they are 2 sides of the same coin.
A Nazism is the opposite, as it was never socialist in more than name.
That is what some people want us to believe.
Hitler rounded up and killed actuals socialists. Read up on the Night of the Long Knives.
Is there any proof of this?
Yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives The article has 79 footnotes from 36 sources, including entire books just devoted to the one event, which took place June 30-July 2, 1934. Nazis regularly sent socialists and communists to concentration camps when discovered. Since they had legal immunity to break into homes and search people, communists, socialists, and trade unionists were the first people sent to concentration camps. The first concentration camp, Dachau, was built in March 1933 as a prison for such people, declared enemies of the state long before the extermination of Jews, Roma, and gays. https://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/7257172.horrors-of-auschwitz/
Jewish people and Hitler had a common enemy in each other.
Hitler was an authoritarian, which is precisely the opposite of socialism.
If pure Socialism worked, why is Cuba in such a bad financial state?
Because there has been a massive blockade for decades. Cuba developed several COVID-19 vaccines that they can’t administer because of a lack of syringes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djj84ooaJCs
What about the vaccine-related deaths?
Not from the Cuban vaccine. Three died from the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/12/cdc-says-28-blood-clot-cases-3-deaths-may-be-linked-to-jj-covid-vaccine.html
Not everyone reacts the same way to the same vaccine.
There have only been three vaccine deaths, and only from Johnson & Johnson. I had unpleasant side effects after my first dose, but they went away.
Did it never occur to you that the reason for the deaths being unreported is due to news sources not wanting to be honest about it?
That doesn’t give anyone the right to make up figures.
According to some people, tuition-free college costs a trillion dollars a year and some say it costs less. Whose math is right?
It costs a fraction of what’s spent on the military each year.
If we cut federal spending across-the-board by 50%, I would not mind redirecting the savings to cover tuition costs.
I think 100% of that cut should come from the military.
Let’s include the salaries of politicians, particularly the idiots who talk about free stuff.
Literally the only people who use the term free are Republicans to disparage those on the left who think taxpayer money should be used to benefit the taxpayer.
Some people may not benefit from college, so why should they pay for other people to go whom they don’t know?
Because all people benefit from an educated society.
What about people who go for online college courses?
Those are often the biggest rip-offs. Let me guess, you owe debt to Trump University, the only school that would accept you?
I have never been to a college/university and don’t plan to.
Because you’re too dumb,.
Because I don’t want to be brainwashed into believing in the “I’m a victim” mentality.
Because you’re dumb enough to believe that’s what colleges teach.
Some, not all, of them do.
Bullshit!
You live in a state of perpetual delusion.
No, I woke up from delusion. I thought I was a conservative during the Clinton years, but I was really against neoliberalism. My excuse is that I was only 16 when he was elected.
I grew up between him and George W. Bush.
I don’t do Instagram.
Says a guy who thinks he knows more than scientists, economists, and historians who say things he doesn’t like.
Whatever.
Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siGCf0u-p14
I will.
I’ve never met a right-winger who understands that circular reasoning is illogical, even though that’s been a recognized fact since ancient Greece. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Circular-Reasoning
How is circular reasoning illogical?
ROTFLMAO! If you were not too lazy to follow the links, you’d get a thorough answer. Briefly, it means that you are asserting two claims are true without providing evidence for either one but saying that one proves the other when neither have been proven. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning in which the two premises are the same claim or nearly the same claim.
I have read other sources that talk about circular reasoning.How exactly are they credible?
I just proved that you’re gay.
Bullshit. I am not gay. Maybe you are.
I used circular reasoning to prove that you’re gay.
No, I am not. Perhaps you are.
I proved that you’re gay because you like having sex with men.
I have never done such a thing, so you are a liar.
Do you still not understand that this is an example of why circular reasoning is illogical?
Circular reasoning being illogical is a debatable thing.
No it’s not. It’s universally recognized Logic 101.
What is so wrong with it as a debate tactic?
Because it’s not logical. It’s just multiple unsupported claims.
Unsupported by people who just claim that it is unsupported.
Unsupported because Crowder provides no support.
His experience with Canadian health care lends legitimacy to his criticisms.
Not really, considering no politician on Earth would even dare cut back on nationalized health care, which makes Biden to the right of Boris Johnson.
You got it completely backwards.
The people of most countries would never allow a scaling back of nationalized health care. In the United States, the mainstream media is so far-right that none of the major media outlets would cover the Medicare for All Marches in 100 cities, but they’ll cover a Tea Party rally with 20 people.
I do like Medicare For All to some degree.
If you think circular reasoning is logical, then logical consistency means that I proved that you’re gay.
I am not gay.
Circular reasoning proves that you are. The most anti-gay people always prove to be gay, anyway.
I am not anti-gay, nor am I gay, you chuckle head.
Circular reasoning proves that you are.
Your circular reason b.s. is laughable.
All circular reasoning is laughable. That was my point.
I see.
You said circular reasoning is logical.
Circular reasoning is making up two things and claiming that they prove each other. There’s no logic to it. Begging the question is when you make one claim and try to prove it with the same or similar claim, e.g. your claim that Steven Crowder is truthful because you believe him. That’s not evidence that Steven Crowder is truthful.
His bad experiences with the Canadian healthcare system may be anomalous, however, are you going to deny the fact that no system of medical care is perfect?
I never claimed any system was perfect.
I know that.
You reject all experts and believe the word of Steven Crowder no matter what. You worship him as your god.
Not as a God. Just one who speaks the truth.
He’s a known liar paid off by the oil industry. He’s done PragerU videos, which are funded by the oil industry,
Can you prove this?
Not to someone who ignores all evidence he doesn’t like. I’ve posted links to several articles that you dismissed without reading,.
I have read them. They are non-credible.
But you think a guy like Steven Crowder making all sorts pf claims he doesn’t back up with evidence is credible. Your criteria for determining credibility is extremely flawed, illogical, and irrational.
Steven Crowder is not a b.s. artist insofar as I know.
That’s a lie because I sent you a video of him being repeatedly caught red-handed lying.
The true liars are those who presented the video and deliberately distort his words.
No one distorted his words. Stop lying.
You buy into propaganda.
No, if I bought into Steven Crowder’s claims, I would be buying into propaganda.
Steven Crowder is more credible than people like Bernie Sanders when it comes to analysis of universal health care.
No he’s not. He’s a documented liar and known to be paid off by the Koch brothers,
Really?
Again, watch the video I posted earlier in the thread that you’ve repeatedly failed to describe accurately, said you watched but later admitted you didn’t, and basically made yourself look like an ass to anyone who did.
I will watch it on my time.
The video is literally Steven Crowder saying what he thinks Hitler believed and passages from Mein Kampf that completely contradict Crowder’s claims, then video of Crowder claiming that the Nazis did certain things that are then disproven by multiple history books, pamphlets and newspapers of the time, etc.
What about the massacre of the Jews?
What about it?
Was that Capitalist-motivated or was that just Adolf Hitler being a murderous asshole?
Mainly that he was a murderous asshole, but Hitler was a huge fan of privatization; however, like most countries, he nationalized for the war effort.
So we agree that he was a murderous asshole.
That was never in dispute.
I know.
Then why did you say it was?
Because Adolf Hitler never identified as a Capitalist.
That’s a lie.
Nazism is anti-capitalist.
No, it’s not.
Yes, it is.
The claim that Nazis were anti-capitalist is objectively false., https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/04/capitalism-and-nazism/
According to Left-leaning news sources.
I showed you a passage from a 1944 book by economist Otto Nathan, who escaped from Nazi Germany, who specifically said that Nazis were not socialist,
He probably only said that to cover his ass.
In 1944? You’re an idiot.
Doofus!
Why would someone writing in 1944 be forced to say that Nazism wasn’t socialist in in character?
Probably to make the Nazi regime look good.
And why would someone who escaped the Nazis and was living in the United States want to do that? Your ideas are beyond stupid.
Whatever you say.
You just keep making unreasonable claims that you can’t back up.
Yeah, whatever you say.
Bloomberg is not a left-leaning news source.
I will look into it.
Right-wing sources lie the most. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CswX826jAf8
It would be true either way, however, who would you believe about the Earth being round: people on the Left or people on the Right?
People on the left.
What a surprise.
Right-wingers say anything to fit their agenda. They are incredibly unprincipled. Just like the whole Blue Lives Matter fraud;.
No, dude. the democrats are.
The Democrats aren’t terribly principled evil, but the Republicans are worse.
2 sides of the same coin.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/04/capitalism-and-nazism/
Nazism is Socialist. Capitalism is capitalistic.
Obviously you’re completely incapable of learning. Nazis were not socialists. Nazis murdered socialists, first in concentration camps, then on the night of the Long Knives, they murdered those whom they had sheepdogged into the party. Nazis were extreme capitalists.
Propaganda. Here is a link for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
Nazism is NOT socialist. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c9476/c9476.pdf
Sure it is.
Translation: “I is smarter then NE dum economist who escaped Nazi Germany.”
According to http://www.wikipedia.org, Nazism, officially National Socialism, , is the ideology and practices associated with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP, or National Socialist German Workers’ Party in English) in Nazi Germany. During Hitler’s rise to power in 1930s Europe, it was frequently referred to as Hitlerism. The later related term “Neo-Nazism” is applied to other far-right groups with similar ideas which formed after the collapse of the Nazi regime. Nazism is a form of fascism, with disdain for liberal democracy and the parliamentary system. It incorporates fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, scientific racism, and the use of eugenics into its creed. Its extreme nationalism originated in pan-Germanism and the ethno-nationalist Völkisch movement which had been a prominent aspect of German nationalism since the late 19th century, and it was strongly influenced by the Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged after Germany’s defeat in World War I, from which came the party’s underlying “cult of violence.” Nazism subscribed to pseudo-scientific theories of a racial hierarchy and social Darwinism, identifying the Germans as a part of what the Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous German society based on racial purity which represented a people’s community (Volksgemeinschaft). The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum and exclude those who they deemed either Community Aliens or “inferior” races.
By your logic, buffalo wings come from buffalos. Apart from the name, there is absolutely nothing here that describes socialism nor says that Nazism was a socialist system. Again, the name was to sheepdog socialists in the party in order to kill them.
Try explaining that to Steven Crowder.
Crowder is paid to lie, and considering how much time you spend lying on my blog, you probably are, too.
If he lies about anything, I have yet to hear it.
Because you refuse to watch the video demonstrating why everything he spouts is either a lie or misleading. Playing ignorant doesn’t make you smart.
Steven Crowder is not an idiot.
No, just a calculating liar.
No, Alex Jones is a calculating liar.
No argument there,
His rantings are amusing, however, unless the facts are truly on his side, I don’t give him any of my time.
So you believe that Velveeta is liquid gold and should sell for $1,797.00 an ounce.
Not at all.
If you believe Nazis were socialist because it’s in the name, then you must logically believe that Velveeta is liquid gold.
One has no relevance to the other.
You believe the name means something; therefore, it does.
You are in la la land.
You think all historians are in la la land because no historian thinks that Nazis were socialist..
What history books are you reading? Howard Zinn?
I already answered that. Now shut the fuck up since you’re clearly incapable of being honest.
As if you get truth from unbiased sources.
A lot less biased than yours. Did you see the cop talking about the people in MAGA hats beating the shit out of him and calling him the N-word that Trump said was given hugs and kisses?
Media lies and distortion.
His own words, you imbecile.
Probably twisted and taken out of intended context.
Bullshit.
Not likely.
Again, the cop’s own words. You right-wingers always trust cops unless it’s convenient. You’ve proven Blue Lives Matter is a racist movement by failing to support the Capitol Police officers recovering from their injuries on January 6.
So is Black Lives Matter.
Bullshit. Right-wingers have been lying about Black Lives Matter ad nauseum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CswX826jAf8&pp=sAQA
Whatever you say.
Right-wingers have been taking footage where BLM activists were attacked and fought back, edited to not show the attack, then falsely attributed to other BLM rallies. Just like Israel used falsely described video to pretend victimhood a few months back.
Does this stem from credible news sources?
Yes, it does.
Like what? The New York Times? CNN? The Washington Post?
They suck, but they’re more credible than your news sources.
Oh, please, don’t give me that.
Says a guy who believes stuff Steven Crowder makes up about German history.
Adolf Hitler was a mass murderer.
Way to bring up something that’s not in dispute!
This is true.
The video proves it.
Any video can be made and edited to spin things in favor of the people who make and edit the video.
But when you delete the instigation to make others look violent, that’s dishonest, as is using one video and pretending it’s multiple different rallies.
What about Antifa?
What about it? It simply means antifascist. All decent people are Antifa.
To some, it also means anti-First Amendment.
To liars.
Bullshit.
Capitalism is pure evil: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SBFnIXtRz8
No.
So you think putting profit before people is ethical.