Skip to content

Bureaucracy=Idiocracy

January 4, 2013

My Medicaid ran out on December 31, 2012, and although I remain eligible, I am required to go through the entire application process again. They said it was because they didn’t have the correct address for me, even though their mailings have gotten to my mailing address in the past. Meanwhile, my impetigo festers, and the pain on my neck, and in particular, the back of my head, is increasing. No one in the government, including the Department of Health or the Department of Homeless Services, is willing to take responsibility for the dirty pillow that was provided to me that Dr. Akwuba says is the cause.

I was told to call a certain number to ask for emergency Medicaid in order to obtain the topical antibiotic, which is $155 out of pocket (the other prescription, for the surgical hand cleaner, turned out to be over the counter, costing me $12 in generic form). I called this number at 9:11 AM. After 10 minutes and 52 seconds, I was alerted that I would be placed on auto callback. I waited around at the pharmacy until nearly noon, then walked back to the shelter for lunch. I then took the train to Brooklyn College to use the computers, something I had not done before, thinking surely that they would make the call while I was on the train, causing it to go straight to my voice mail. As I write this, I am at Brooklyn College, it is 2:41 PM, and Medicaid has made no attempt as yet to return my phone call.

If my infection spreads to others, it is entirely the fault of Medicaid’s bureaucrats for denying me the necessary medication. I want to hold the shelter in tort for the infection to begin with. I will contact the attorneys I know separately so that it will look less like I’m fishing. When I was able to get only one particular neurologist on Staten Island, and not the one that my podiatrist really wanted to see, I criticized Medicaid as existing solely for the prevention of communicable disease spreading among what they must consider “the rabble.” Now I see that they don’t even care about that, even though I am never at the shelter except to sleep, eat breakfast, occasionally eat dinner, rarely eat lunch, and whenever I have a mandatory appointment with the staff, so very little of my time is spent amongst those they might classify with this concept.

9 Comments
  1. lawyer lou permalink

    Gosh, I don’t know about this one. In suits against government agencies, the stats aren’t real good for cases when the plaintiff is a psychotic homeless man with anger issues. I don’t think it’s worth my time. Maybe call Judge Judy?

  2. Scott Salamone permalink

    You are psychotic from what I can tell by reading your blogs! Lazy, psychotc and certifiably insane!

  3. lawyer lou permalink

    First of all, to prove libel you would have to establish that the statement made was untrue. Secondly, I didn’t call you anything. I only made a statement about relevant case law as it pertains to how a court or jury may perceive you.

  4. lawyer lou permalink

    Are you functionally illiterate? I didn’t say they would assume that. I only said they may perceive you in that way, which might affect the outcome of our case.

    If you think you can get through the trial without coming off the way you do on this blog (i.e. completely out of touch with reality and mad as heck about everything) then we might have a shot here.

    • I’m not out of touch with reality, but it seems like 90% of those who comment on my blog are.

    • No, you actually said “the stats aren’t real good for cases when the plaintiff is a psychotic homeless man with anger issues. I don’t think it’s worth my time,” which implies that you think I’m psychotic, although you have no evidence for that claim.

Leave a reply to Scott Andrew Hutchins Cancel reply